What's new
By:

College Basketball '14-15......

and while I am speaking of my team.. vs. bandwagon stuff..

when has BYU been to a F4?
Utes?
Zags? (never)

Meanwhile, everyone piling on against a historically great team fails to give credit for that team now reaching 4 final4's in the past 5 years.

UK rocks. And you haters, all of you, are just mad. We may lose, but it doesn't make your miserable team (as if you had one) any less.. miserable.
 
Dr. Jones said:
and while I am speaking of my team.. vs. bandwagon stuff..

when has BYU been to a F4?
Utes?
Zags? (never)

Meanwhile, everyone piling on against a historically great team fails to give credit for that team now reaching 4 final4's in the past 5 years.

UK rocks. And you haters, all of you, are just mad. We may lose, but it doesn't make your miserable team (as if you had one) any less.. miserable.
Click to expand...

"like"
 
dalamon said:
The biggest thing the Irish have on the Badgers is poise. The Irish had probably the most poise in this tournament. If jump-shots aren't falling, I can see Wisconsin just caving in. The Irish are way better (from what little I've seen) at having offensive cohesion, and discipline.

But, if Dekker & Frank are hitting shots, and Nigel gets in the mix too? Tough matchup for UK.
Click to expand...

If anyone can defend Kaminsky, it's the combo of WCS and Towns.
 
spycam1 said:
If anyone can defend Kaminsky, it's the combo of WCS and Towns.
Click to expand...

and if a player is drawing defensive attention from two elite bigs, it opens up the O for other teammates.

Wisconsin has multiple covers. They're very, very difficult to guard. Stanley Johnson looked like garbage against them-- and he's supposed to be one of the best wing defenders in the nation
 
Dr. Jones said:
we did that last year with WCS and Randle.

Towns and one year older WCS is better. (but not tonight against ND.. maybe God really does like Catholics?)
Click to expand...

Everyone with half a brain knows how much better the Badgers are, across the board, this year than last year. Frank is a monster on offense, and the attention he'll command will lift the games of others. Dekker put up 20 points in a single ****ing half tonight.
 
Dr. Jones said:
and while I am speaking of my team.. vs. bandwagon stuff..

when has BYU been to a F4?
Utes?
Zags? (never)

Meanwhile, everyone piling on against a historically great team fails to give credit for that team now reaching 4 final4's in the past 5 years.

UK rocks. And you haters, all of you, are just mad. We may lose, but it doesn't make your miserable team (as if you had one) any less.. miserable.
Click to expand...


I don't hate UK. I am not a fan of coach Cal though for him pimping Kanter so badly when it was obviously dude can't play defense and I would love Zags to beat them in finals.
Oh and I am not a huge NCAA expert and picked Zags this year mainly because of Stockton history, two Canucks, Sabonis, Dranginis ( another Lithuanian) and because I love Spokane:)
 
dalamon said:
and if a player is drawing defensive attention from two elite bigs, it opens up the O for other teammates.

Wisconsin has multiple covers. They're very, very difficult to guard. Stanley Johnson looked like garbage against them-- and he's supposed to be one of the best wing defenders in the nation
Click to expand...

WCS can take on Kaminsky alone (wherever he is on the floor) while Towns protects the paint. At least that's how I would initially approach guarding him to start the game.

I like UK's chances of defending Kaminsky better than Wisky's chances of defending Towns.

It should be a great game, and I could see it going either way, but give some credit to UK; they're not undefeated for no reason.
 
If the refs stay out of it, Wisconsin wins by double digits.

40-0 would be a great story for the ncaa doe, and if they've committed to it this far I don't see them going away from it.
 
spycam1 said:
WCS can take on Kaminsky alone (wherever he is on the floor) while Towns protects the paint. At least that's how I would initially approach guarding him to start the game.

I like UK's chances of defending Kaminsky better than Wisky's chances of defending Towns.

It should be a great game, and I could see it going either way, but give some credit to UK; they're not undefeated for no reason.
Click to expand...

Spy, staaahhhp.
 
spycam1 said:
WCS can take on Kaminsky alone (wherever he is on the floor) while Towns protects the paint. At least that's how I would initially approach guarding him to start the game.

I like UK's chances of defending Kaminsky better than Wisky's chances of defending Towns.

It should be a great game, and I could see it going either way, but give some credit to UK; they're not undefeated for no reason.
Click to expand...

who guards Dekker on the perimeter? Nigel?
 
Wisconsin is the NCAA version of the 2014 Spurs. 5 players that can live on the perimeter. The hub of their offense being a bigman who can shoot, dribble, and pass. Plenty of dribble penetration and spacing. Great swingman with height and defense with lengthy range.

Spurs buzz-sawed the talented Heat. Wisconsin will buzz-saw UK if they play.
 
dalamon said:
Wisconsin is the NCAA version of the 2014 Spurs. 5 players that can live on the perimeter. The hub of their offense being a bigman who can shoot, dribble, and pass. Plenty of dribble penetration and spacing. Great swingman with height and defense with lengthy range.

Spurs buzz-sawed the talented Heat. Wisconsin will buzz-saw UK if they play.
Click to expand...

I'm reading this and declaring it as truth every night before I go to bed for the next 7 days.
 
MVP said:
But Heat had no inside presence. UK has plenty
Click to expand...

Dude, what the hell? Bosh and Lebron are both elite inside the paint. Towns, best case scenario, will be AS GOOD as Chris Bosh when he hits the NBA. Get real, brudda.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top