What you aren't understanding is that we NEED the playmaking capabilities from Burks. We were 25TH last year in league offense. We need to maximize the offensive potential of all our players. Putting Burks in a different position, and asking him to spend tons of energy guarding players his frame isn't built for (IMO) neuters this. Hayward already has a ****-ton of playmaking capabilities-- that's precisely the problem in fact. He needs help. Badly. Hood's emergence helps, and Burks could put everything over the top. This is of extreme importance given the state of offense from our current PG play.
No, I get that. But I also don't fully buy into the whole he will be to tired argument. I wouldn't mind him having some time at the 1 but not the 70% your throw around. For example, I would not have Burks guarding Paul when we play the Clips but Burks can certainly play some one when the Jazz play teams with slower PGs. I will leave that up to Snyder though as he knows far more than any of us do.
But none of this has anything to really do with my post quoting yours where you intentionally (I know you're smart enough to know what NAOS meant) missed the point. It was never a direct Harper-Burks comparison. Beyond that I am not really taking either side as I think you are both to extreme in your position.