D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Rondo made just 0.4 per game last season and has averaged 0.2 for his career.
good call. So in terms of PGs, that's probably it. Unless I'm missing someone else.
Rondo made just 0.4 per game last season and has averaged 0.2 for his career.
Rubio last season and for his career has made 0.6 per.
Not a fan of Favs at the 5, and to say that Kevin Martin is a pylon on D would be disrespectful to the pylon.
Rubio absolutely blows overall IMO though. If I'm the Wolves, I package him and Shabazz for Schröder.
Shabazz is a scorer and that's about it. Mediocre at best defender, inept passer.
To me the lineup below could be really, really good on both sides of the ball. That is if they got rid of Flip who's been a joke for 20 years now.
Schröder
Lavine
Wiggins
Whoever--Thon Maker would be scary
Towns
Andrew Wiggins shooting 31% from three isn't scary at all either.
They also just drafted Tyus Jones who could be pretty decent.
I wouldn't make that deal. Shabazz showed a lot of promise last year.
I was one of the ones who said he'd bust too. I did a 180 after watching him play.
You are right that he isn't a great passer right now, but maybe he will be. He certainly can score the ball, and do it efficiently.
I'd see what he has before bailing on him so soon.
I'd certainly rather have him and Dieng over Burke. What a terrible trade that turned out to be for us.
Little confused as to how we can predict how most rookies will do next year as there is nothing in the past to look at. Me personally, I've never seen guys like super Mario play. All I know is he's supposedly a good shooter and athlete. Now he probably will be considered as not important to hacks team which I like a lot. I even considered KAT but chose not to due to too much unknown, and truth be told I don't know much about him as far as playing style. Should be interesting.
Doesn't really matter what I think (I think we will fight for 7th or 8th and win about 46-48 games)So you think we aren't making the playoffs?
Yeah, but do you really expect that number not to improve next year? Be honest. Wiggins is a beast and has good shot form, the number will improve. The argument of Log not having a lot of 3 point shooting is a spacing argument. No one is just going to ignore Wiggins on the perimeter next year.
Yeah, but do you really expect that number not to improve next year? Be honest. Wiggins is a beast and has good shot form, the number will improve. The argument of Log not having a lot of 3 point shooting is a spacing argument. No one is just going to ignore Wiggins on the perimeter next year.
It will improve for sure, but lets not kid ourselves into thinking he's a good three-point shooter. The fact of the matter is when you look at his team do you see anyone and say "Damn, can't give that guy any space or else he will drain threes"? No you don't.
I actually offered him Klay Thompson + extra pieces in a deal for Blake Griffin. He said it wouldn't improve him team at all. It actually would because he can play Big Al and Dwight together plus I was giving him another big back in the deal.
Someone once told me that 3 assists shows that lack of court vision doeLOL at everyone here who thinks Rodney Hood isn't a starting caliber play next year.
Dude shots 46% and 42% from the field and 3 point land respectively after the All-Star break when he finally got healthy.
In the last month of the season, where Hayward was sitting games, Hood assumed more playmaking responsibility and had a stat line of 16.7 ppg with 3.4 rebounds and 3.4 assist.
No, but I don't think you can just ignore any of his starters either. I don't think spacing is a major problem with his team.