Name a better wing rotation than Hayward Hood Burks

[Siro]

Neto has been pretty legit lately besides fouling his *** off tonight.

Obviously we need a more legit PG, but his legitness is adequate.

Adequate is inadequate.

I know everyone is all excited now, and I don't want to rain on anyone's parade. But we're still headed for a quick first round exit. With a Teague level PG we'd have a good chance of capturing the 5th spot, and a reasonable chance of beating the LA Crybabies.

Fingers crossed.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Adequate is inadequate.

I know everyone is all excited now, and I don't want to rain on anyone's parade. But we're still headed for a quick first round exit. With a Teague level PG we'd have a good chance of capturing the 5th spot, and a reasonable chance of beating the LA Crybabies.

Fingers crossed.

Fingers crossed over here, but I'm not getting my hopes up. I wonder how a PG like Teague would mesh with 2 high usage wings like Hayward/Hood have become. It'd be interesting.

 

[seattlejazzfan]

Fingers crossed over here, but I'm not getting my hopes up. I wonder how a PG like Teague would mesh with 2 high usage wings like Hayward/Hood have become. It'd be interesting.

And you also have Favors who is a very good scorer that needs touches. The ideal PG would be a pass first, second and third (like Neto/Exum), who defends and is a lights out three point threat spotting up.

If Exum could hit the three at about 40%, he'd be the perfect fit on this team.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

And you also have Favors who is a very good scorer that needs touches. The ideal PG would be a pass first, second and third (like Neto/Exum), who defends and is a lights out three point threat spotting up.

Exum really is the ideal PG for us, he just has to develop.

 

[seattlejazzfan]

Exum really is the ideal PG for us, he just has to develop.

Funny, I edited my post to include that last sentence at the same time you posted that.

 

[Jazz4ever]

Adequate is inadequate.

I know everyone is all excited now, and I don't want to rain on anyone's parade. But we're still headed for a quick first round exit. With a Teague level PG we'd have a good chance of capturing the 5th spot, and a reasonable chance of beating the LA Crybabies.

Fingers crossed.

With Gasol going down the 5th seed is tempting to go for. It would require Teague, Neto and Burke would not be good enough to get us 5th.

 

[Jamezz]

Curry is a wing?

Maybe he meant he likes curry with his wings.

 

[spycam1]

And you also have Favors who is a very good scorer that needs touches. The ideal PG would be a pass first, second and third (like Neto/Exum), who defends and is a lights out three point threat spotting up.

If Exum could hit the three at about 40%, he'd be the perfect fit on this team.

George Hill would be a good fit.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

 

[fishonjazz]

George Hill would be a good fit.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Truth

 

[Game6Conley]

We made it my ninjas!!! Utah's taking the league by storm, and it's only the beginning!!!!

 

[tleikheen]

Now imagine how good we'd be with a legit PG.

When Exum starts with Hood and Hayward ,you will see great defense creating offense.What was expected for this year will be even more expected next year.

I expect great defense( #1 rated),more points and top 3 in point differential.Doubters beware,Jazz have something going on.They are building a team as fast and athletic as GS ,but longer in all positions.

 

[Game6Conley]

The Wing rotation in Utah is legit, can't wait to see Burks back in action!!! Hood is one of the best lefty's in the league, as predicted by yours truly on draft night.

Imagine if they paid Kent Bazemore instead of Ingles this offseason? They'd probably be juggling minutes and playing Hayward at 4 some because the small-ball lineups would be dangerous.

 

[fishonjazz]

This is why the "cake bakers" didn't want to get carroll, danny green, wes matthews.

 

[jope]

i like our guys.

thompson / barnes / iggy / draymond is a pretty damn good set of wings though

 

[GVC]

This is why the "cake bakers" didn't want to get carroll, danny green, wes matthews.

Because they like watching Chris Johnson, Joe Ingles and Li'l Sap?

 

[GVC]

i like our guys.

thompson / barnes / iggy / draymond is a pretty damn good set of wings though

Draymond isn't a wing. Dude's a 4 (who also plays 5 in their small ball lineups).

 

[Coach Ellis]

i like our guys.

thompson / barnes / iggy / draymond is a pretty damn good set of wings though

Don't think I'd consider Green a wing. He mostly plays bigger than his size would indicate - pretty much 4/5 exclusively.

Thompson, Barnes and Iggy are a very good trio, but imagine Hayward, Hood and Burks with Curry - that's dirty. Jazz have a clear advantage at the wing.

 

[jope]

Draymond isn't a wing. Dude's a 4 (who also plays 5 in their small ball lineups).

"So are you a small forward or a power forward?" and I was like, "I'm a basketball player." Period. Don't tell me I'm a small forward because you are taking away what I can do as a power forward. Don't consider me a power forward because you are taking away what I can do as a small forward. I'm just a basketball player and that's how I've always looked at it.

On pretty much any other team he would be a stocky 3 that splits time at the 4. Don't the unique-ness of the Warriors fool you into thinking he's strictly a 4. he can (and does) play the 3 depending on situations.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Because they like watching Chris Johnson, Joe Ingles and Li'l Sap?

Chemistry issues. You need wings who are fine with playing max 20mpg. Burks would need to be sent out.

 

[GVC]

...but imagine Hayward, Hood and Burks with Curry - that's dirty. Jazz have a clear advantage at the wing.

Even better, imagine Hayward, Hood, and a good third wing with Curry.