Most anticipated Presidential debate ever. **** show round 2.
- Thread starter Hotdog
- Start date
Exactly. Debates are useless. They are more about entertainment than information.
Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
And you hunger for information. Yeah..
I prefer #erections bigly or perhaps #bigly erect
Like, obviously?
You appear to have a nose for that sort of thing.
Hey JeJas, does this moral absolutism you have come from you, or your internet dominance paid-to-post management? For laughs I listened today to XM 127 "progress" programming that sounds just like you. Did you get an A on those boot-licking college courses, too?
Hillary is a smoothie, a pro at laying out the lines, but her thinking all comes from the same box.
Once upon a time I studied a man I worked for, a billionaire New Yorker sorta like Trump. Hillary literally drools over these fools if she thinks they might write a check, but she preaches all day long, and twice on Sundays, about being for the little people. Not a chance that can really be true. She doesn't like anybody, not even Trumps kids. It's all about HRC. Bill knows that more than anybody, that's why he never had a normal affection for his wife. That's why he was out there harassing other women all the time, and being a perv. Hillary and Bill are the most sold-out politicians in world history, and yet here you are idolizing them.
Whatever else you can say about Trump, he knows the Clintons and he's decided to give us another choice.
He is actually a more original version of a human being than you are, or the Clintons. Progressivism is a bankrupt idolatry dedicated to solidifying wealth and power on the very few who dare claw their way to the top. That's why Trump was spot on about Hillary in his "compliment". Maybe he's no better, but he is his own sort of man. And we have to start somewhere to take down the delusional world of "progress" that's taking us right back to the dark ages educationally, socially, morally, and politically.
Well, birds of a feather...
What in God's green earth are you talking about. I'd rather read Julia Kristeva on PCP than try to make any sense of this incoherent monstrosity.
Not "in" Gods green earth... but "on"... but carry on.
Not "Not 'in' Gods green earth... but 'on'... but carry on."...but "Not 'in' God's green earth... but 'on'... but carry on." but carry on...
LOL .. according to CNN polls 54% of people thought Hillary won the debate and Trump got 37%.
Were we watching the same debate?!?! LOL .. Trump clearly got the better of Hillary in this one.
Were we watching the same debate?!?! LOL .. Trump clearly got the better of Hillary in this one.
No, my deflection of my incorrectness onto yours shows that this is an internet forum and not a scientific publication. I already write more pretentiously than I should for this format, and I **** up egregiously in first drafts of important documents all the time. I don't want to have to send my posts to a proofreader to maintain some sort of forum reputation of pristine writing. I prefer to take internet forum posts on their content rather than on a grammatical or stylistic error. Identifying prose **** ups or stupid writing errors is something I've never done, nor intend to do. It may give one a sense of superiority to identify these on the internet, but I take this writing format for what it is. I'm already tense enough.
You should be less tense.
I love you as a brother already... and look for opportunities to connect rather than disconnect... but take into account "your kind."
I'm not sure if this is test, but what about "GODISNOWHERE." When style and grammar affect meaning, then clarification is needed and welcomed.
Do you watch "Entertainment Tonight" by chance?
If not, you should. I think you would love it.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
This is ridiculous. Clinton could have said exactly what Trump said. Most people in Trump's position would have withdrawn from the race 20 times over by now. I thought he was done after the McCain comment, and that now seems like almost noting in light of all the other campaign killing moments he's created and survived since then. Or she could say that he's a hard worker. Can that be denied? His campaign schedule seems insane to me. Or she could say she admires his ability to look out for his own interests (sort of a back-handed insult). Or she could say she admires his hair (which would have gotten a laugh). Or she could say she's in awe of his ability to promote himself, or to get the media to talk about him, or to energize his base, or to hold large campaign events, or to perform at a high level in multiple careers, or to bed women, or to accumulate wealth...