Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
Isn't that something?
Should we read anything into that?
Should we read anything into that?
Isn't that something?
Should we read anything into that?
I'm still in shock, but it's not like this game didn't mean anything to the Lakers. They are chasing the spurs and can still fall behind the mavs. I assume we caught them sleeping, but I'd love to hear some analysis that says we'll be doing this more often.
Other thoughts, no AK, Harris or Fes. (I think it's safe to say no Raja is addition by subtraction)
Watch us take down the spurs next lol.
Isn't that something?
Should we read anything into that?
hmmm.. could it be that Lakers were forced to defend a different type of offense they were used to (i.e., penetrate & dish VS flex)?
Jackson's been up against Sloan for so long, could it be that he's still trying to figure out what Corbin's doing with his offensive strategy?
No. 2 games ago the Jazz were blow out on their home floor by this same Laker team, a game in which Hayward shot 3-9. Hayward played out of his mind tonight, Watson hit 2 big threes and Favors was able to do what Al couldn't - catch and finish. Jazz played good defense - but the Lakers also played like crap. LA missed alot of open shots - if they shot like that in the playoffs last year the Jazz would've won games 1 & 3.Isn't that something?
Should we read anything into that?
hmmm.. could it be that Lakers were forced to defend a different type of offense they were used to (i.e., penetrate & dish VS flex)?
No.
Lakers shot 37% and had 21 turnovers and still only lost by 1.
No.
Lakers shot 37% and had 21 turnovers and still only lost by 1.
No. 2 games ago the Jazz were blow out on their home floor by this same Laker team, a game in which Hayward shot 3-9. Hayward played out of his mind tonight, Watson hit 2 big threes and Favors was able to do what Al couldn't - catch and finish. Jazz played good defense - but the Lakers also played like crap. LA missed alot of open shots - if they shot like that in the playoffs last year the Jazz would've won games 1 & 3.
What we should read into this is that it's a great win for a young team that hopefully gives them confidence they can compete with the better teams.
No.
Lakers shot 37% and had 21 turnovers and still only lost by 1.
here's what you read into it: H.A.Y.W.A.R.D.