What's new

2016-17 NBA PLAYOFFS THREAD

The Jazz need one more go-to offensive player to complement Hayward. It's true. But the Jazz are capable of acquiring that player or developing that player. Boston's situation is iffy, especially if their #1 player is about to get traded out. Horford on a max deal at 31-33 years old isn't helping a contender. The Lakers have an equal or stronger case to Hayward with Ball, George in FA, Hayward and one other piece a year from now.

The idea that the Celtics are ready to compete falls apart if they trade their "MVP".

I have no idea why you are so dismissive on Horford. I dont think you watch him.

And again, the Lakers are in the West, an they dont have a strong case at all. Their coach isnt as good as Stevens and they dont have as many future assets to build with and are in the harder conference.

They would get Jimmy Butler, who is ions better than IT. So is Hayward. They would be subtracting one overrated 5'9 PG for two 6'8 All-Stars (plus w/e they get out of IT)
 
Yes, I think if Butler/George cost too many assets to get, they dont sign Hayward and just do it through the young guys while trading IT.
So what about the other part of my post? Do you know how the celtics got all these top picks 3 years in a row? What did they give up?
 
cacb6587a8b0df38106f25f4399de958.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
They traded Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett to the Nets for 4 first-round picks.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
What the ****? What good did that do the nets? Weren't those dudes petty old? How good did that make the nets?

****ing boston. Lucky ****s.
 
What the ****? What good did that do the nets? Weren't those dudes petty old? How good did that make the nets?

****ing boston. Lucky ****s.

What a terrible ****ing trade!! It makes my eyes bleed just looking at that. A bunch of 35 year olds for the team's future??
 
What a terrible ****ing trade!! It makes my eyes bleed just looking at that. A bunch of 35 year olds for the team's future??

That's what happens when a billionaire buys a team and tells the GM to do w/e it takes to compete or you are fired.
 
I have no idea why you are so dismissive on Horford. I dont think you watch him.

And again, the Lakers are in the West, an they dont have a strong case at all. Their coach isnt as good as Stevens and they dont have as many future assets to build with and are in the harder conference.

They would get Jimmy Butler, who is ions better than IT. So is Hayward. They would be subtracting one overrated 5'9 PG for two 6'8 All-Stars (plus w/e they get out of IT)


Okay, so wake me once they trade for Butler, trade IT, and keep enough cap space to max out Hayward.
 
The upside for Boston about them getting blown out: You know Chicago and Indiana FO are watching this and saying to themselves: Is it really worth it to keep George/Butler? Let's just give them to Boston for their 2018 pick and a handful of young guys.
 
Back
Top