Douchebag K
Well-Known Member
I don't really know what you mean by saying it was over the top. The reason why I used that phrase is because Dennis Lindsey used it to describe Ingles. Ingles doesn't have an agenda when he's out on the floor. He takes what the defense gives him and makes the right play.
Dante is not there as a player. He doesn't read the game well, and that is troubling for a player who isn't good enough to force himself on the defense. The reason why he disappears so easily and has ugly moments with the ball is because he commits to what he's doing before it happens. There's not a whole lot of read and react to his game. He has tunnel vision.
He is inexperienced, and he will get better, but you can only improve so much. His current skill and experience levels are huge obstacles right now.
for an inexperienced player he's actually a pretty good passer. There's no doubt his lack of playing 5 on 5 is a huge deal at the moment. His rookie season he was rightly criticized for always wanting to pass, now this year it's probably that he always tried to take it to the basket ? Saying that he always plays with an agenda makes it sound like he's always trying to get his stats which is certainly not the case. He's trying to figure out how he can be effective which with his current skill set isn't that much ! His pre-committing to a move has been a big problem but i would hardly call it playing with an agenda. And of course Jingles plays with no agenda, firstly he has to with his skill set, and he's had 10-11 years of playing a lot of high quality professional basketball to learn.
and as for "you can only improve so much" would you have applied that to Gordon and Rudy 3-4 years ago ?