Ricky and Rudy PmR's would be orgasmic.
Huh? The PG can more-easily drop under the screen and make mud for the roll man. Lobs don't require the highest amount of skill in passing, they do require the lane.
Ricky and Rudy PmR's would be orgasmic.
Everyone choosing Hill over Bledsoe needs to call an Uber. You're drunk.
Hill is eons better than Bledsoe.
Bledsoe has played half a NBA season or less due to injury 3 times in his 7 year career. And 2 of those have been with Phoenix, who are lauded as having one of the top medical teams in the NBA.
Could Utah clear enough cap space for Millsap?If I knew we'd use every dollar of "savings" from attaining Patrick Beverley for a big splash at PF, then I'm ready to vote for Bev. He's a better on-ball defender than Hill, and I think he's demonstrated that he can hit the open, catch-and-shoot 3. If we retain Hayward, Ingles, and Hood, then we have plenty of playmaking. And if we brought back Millsap, then we'd have even more. Basically, the idea that Bev allows us to get Love or Millsap without paying a huge tax penalty is extremely enticing.
Turf toe is concerning? It's not like a torn ACL or a bad back. Hill needed to shut it down earlier last season and let it heal. But Utah didn't have other options at PG. Mack and Neto are 3rd-stringers. Exum was underwhelming. George rushed back too soon (twice) and never gave it a chance to heal.In the past 3 years Bledsoe has played more games than Hill. He's also 3 years younger. Hill's toe is concerning.
Could Utah clear enough cap space for Millsap?
Love is unlikely. Who would Cleveland want back via trade? They're still trying to hold together their team for one last season.
Could Utah clear enough cap space for Millsap?
Love is unlikely. Who would Cleveland want back via trade? They're still trying to hold together their team for one last season.
I'll bet Boston has offered Indiana Tatum. Getting George (with a commitment to extend for 3 years) AND Hayward as a FA is worth Boston giving him up. Utah can't match that short of giving up Gobert, which would be ridiculous.Cleveland doesn't want anything from us, but we can facilitate them getting George because Indiana doesn't want Love but I'd assume they'd take Favors + picks + Hood or Exum. Same thing with NY and Carmelo.
Can they even afford Hill? Just traded for a star, and have to sign there young guns at some point. Having 20-25 million a year for Hill could complicate things in a couple years. Tell me if I'm wrong. I'm not an expert on the cap.Expect Minnesota to go hard for George Hill
So how about this...
With Mitchell on board I think Exum is a bit expendable. We could move him now if we felt it got us some value. With that said...
Exum, Favs, Burks, and OKC pick for Bledsoe and Dudley. Dudley plays small ball 4 with starters. Bled brings more creating and can be a good defender when engaged and healthy. Two birds... one stone?
I am not sure Phoenix is going full rebuild based on the rumors, but this would start them down the road.
At some point the jazz need to try to make good on the high price the jazz made using the 5th pick for Exum. He showed us a glimpse in that last game vs GS, and expect him to dominate summer league. He could come into next season with a lot of confidence. Kobe seemed to work wonders for Hayward, aren't Exum and Kobe fairly close. Maybe Exum could get some one on one time with Kobe.
So how about this...
With Mitchell on board I think Exum is a bit expendable. We could move him now if we felt it got us some value. With that said...
Exum, Favs, Burks, and OKC pick for Bledsoe and Dudley. Dudley plays small ball 4 with starters. Bled brings more creating and can be a good defender when engaged and healthy. Two birds... one stone?
I am not sure Phoenix is going full rebuild based on the rumors, but this would start them down the road.
No cap specialist here but does that trade even work $$$ wise. I wouldn't hate that deal but Anderson's deal would be the deal killer for me. I think that is why they are trying to get rid of him.What if Houston said berverly/Anderson for Burks ?
They'd could do whatever they want with him, save the cap $ they need for whatever.
We'd get a stretch 4 , who isn't a great defender I know, a PG who can defend who shoot ok as well as addressing 2 of our needs.
Hill can seek his 20 mill per somewhere else
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk