addictionary
Well-Known Member
Just a thought but maybe next year we disallow any players still playing. That would do away with recency bias. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm down with this.
Just a thought but maybe next year we disallow any players still playing. That would do away with recency bias. Lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What if you could not pick a player from the same team twice? You could have Kobe and Shaq but only so long as you had Orlando Shaq.
Having said that, people would prob just look at names and ignore the true rules. Which is why I'm picking who I'm picking next.
Too complicated.
12 players then.
Two from the 60's
Two from the 70's.
Two from the 80's.
Two from the 90's.
Two from the 00's.
Two from the 10's.
We did one like this before.
Your on the clock [MENTION=2096]Hekate[/MENTION]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm down for that
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think it would also be fun to do just 80's and 90's draft. Would be interesting.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I picked Joe Johnson. Cy is on the clock.
That seems complicated. Is it based on how long they played, or the year they were drafted? At most, I'd probably be down for eliminating current players and making retirement as the baseline for eligibility. . . but I've been just fine with how we've done the draft over the past four years. I'd vote to just leave it alone.12 players then.
Two from the 60's
Two from the 70's.
Two from the 80's.
Two from the 90's.
Two from the 00's.
Two from the 10's.
We did one like this before.
That seems complicated. Is it based on how long they played, or the year they were drafted? At most, I'd probably be down for eliminating current players and making retirement as the baseline for eligibility. . . but I've been just fine with how we've done the draft over the past four years. I'd vote to just leave it alone.
12 players then.
Two from the 60's
Two from the 70's.
Two from the 80's.
Two from the 90's.
Two from the 00's.
Two from the 10's.
We did one like this before.
That seems complicated. Is it based on how long they played, or the year they were drafted? At most, I'd probably be down for eliminating current players and making retirement as the baseline for eligibility. . . but I've been just fine with how we've done the draft over the past four years. I'd vote to just leave it alone.
How would we handle guys who played in say both the 60's and 70's or both 80's and 90's being great in both era's
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How would we handle guys who played in say both the 60's and 70's or both 80's and 90's being great in both era's
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Idiot!!!
Answer the ****ing question... idiot!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk