What's new

All-Time NBA Draft Final Four: addictionary vs. White Chocolate

Which team would win in a 7-game series?


  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
"Barkley is like Magic and Bird in that they don't really play a position," Bill Walton said in a SLAM magazine issue ranking NBA greats. "He plays everything; he plays basketball. There is nobody who does what Barkley does. He's a dominant rebounder, a dominant defensive player, a three-point shooter, a dribbler, a playmaker."

For anyone who still thinks "Davis is a better player than Barkley at everything besides passing".
 
For anyone who still thinks "Davis is a better player than Barkley at everything besides passing".
Walton is famous for hyperbole doe
He would probably say davis is a cross between wilt, russell, and jordan or something. It's what Walton is.

He called barkley a 3 point shooter lol
 
Walton is famous for hyperbole doe
He would probably say davis is a cross between wilt, russell, and jordan or something. It's what Walton is.

He called barkley a 3 point shooter lol

You and Ron called Davis a 3pt shooter too lol.
 
I love, love, love Stockton...but he would struggle guarding Westbrook.

That's not a slight either, Westbrook is really good (on offense).

Pierce would absolutely torch Harden and the Pippen/Mashburn matchup is ****ing hilarious.
 
For anyone who still thinks "Davis is a better player than Barkley at everything besides passing".

1) It's Bill Walton, he's a very kind analyst.

2) Calling Barkley a dominant defender and a 3-PT shooter is a stretch. For his career, he shot over 30% from 3 twice. He can shoot them for sure, he just doesn't do it well.

3) That's not a slight on Barkley. He was a great player. I think a player with the versatility and length of AD would be a tough matchup for him on both ends.
 
You and Ron called Davis a 3pt shooter too lol.
I didnt.
I said he is better 3 point shooter than barkley. (Which isn't saying much. Neither are good 3 point shooters)
 
1) It's Bill Walton, he's a very kind analyst.

2) Calling Barkley a dominant defender and a 3-PT shooter is a stretch. For his career, he shot over 30% from 3 twice. He can shoot them for sure, he just doesn't do it well.

3) That's not a slight on Barkley. He was a great player. I think a player with the versatility and length of AD would be a tough matchup for him on both ends.

I get it Westbrook/Davis are too big and athletic for Stockton/Barkley.
 
1) It's Bill Walton, he's a very kind analyst.

2) Calling Barkley a dominant defender and a 3-PT shooter is a stretch. For his career, he shot over 30% from 3 twice. He can shoot them for sure, he just doesn't do it well.

3) That's not a slight on Barkley. He was a great player. I think a player with the versatility and length of AD would be a tough matchup for him on both ends.


Charles would absolutely abuse Davis on the glass though. Davis would just fare well in the face-up game, but if he got it going you have a top 3 defender ever in Pippen to go match up with him.
 
Which is wrong. The years we were comparing Barkley shot better on more attempts.
No doubt. In my post I was saying that AD is a better three point shooter than barkley. I was looking at their careers.
Either way, barkley is not a 3 point shooter..... well not a 3 point maker anyway so what Walton said was dumb. Which was my point
 
Pierce would absolutely torch Harden and the Pippen/Mashburn matchup is ****ing hilarious.

Agreed on the latter.

I think Harden gives Pierce more than Pierce gives Harden.

Harden is an average defender when he cares/tries, and he's shown he does that when he doesn't have as focal of a role on offense.

Personally, I'd put Pippen on Harden and Pierce on Mashvurn. Pierce at SG isn't ideal at all.
 
Agreed on the latter.

I think Harden gives Pierce more than Pierce gives Harden.

Harden is an average defender when he cares/tries, and he's shown he does that when he doesn't have as focal of a role on offense.

Personally, I'd put Pippen on Harden and Pierce on Mashvurn. Pierce at SG isn't ideal at all.

I'm guessing he'd put Harden on Pierce that's why I said that.

Pierce would give Harden the business on offense and Pippen would harass him on defense. It would not go well for the bearded one.
 
No doubt. In my post I was saying that AD is a better three point shooter than barkley. I was looking at their careers.
Either way, barkley is not a 3 point shooter..... well not a 3 point maker anyway so what Walton said was dumb. Which was my point

If Barkley isn't a 3pt maker then neither is Davis.
 
I get it Westbrook/Davis are too big and athletic for Stockton/Barkley.

I wouldn't say Davis is more athletic than Barkley. Barkley was a very good athlete. Problem is length. As a fan of a team with Gobert, you should know how much length matters.

Stockton historically struggled with large, athletic guards on defense. Add in hand check rules, and Stock would have a hard time guarding Westbrook. It's not that outlandish to say.
 
I'm guessing he'd put Harden on Pierce that's why I said that.

Pierce would give Harden the business on offense and Pippen would harass him on defense. It would not go well for the bearded one.

Probably, but you didn't say that Pippen would be guarding Harden. You don't get to change your mind now.
 
Back
Top