Trump Threatens Nuclear War

[DutchJazzer]

Sure, it's not our families living there.

when it's time to go to war. you better be prepared to do anything and eveyrthing neccesary to win!

if that is not what you ar eprepare dot do. let north korea be alone!



with a hydrogen bomb only the north korean die if it is exactly placed. instead of us soldiers and south koreans and china!

sometimes you just gotta drop the bomb.

just like sometimes you gotta shoot a guy in the head.


i do not want war. after trumps announcement the stock market dipped. and i did lose some money.
so i rather have a quick clean 1 bomb war. then a long drawn out 10 year war

 

[Gameface]

when it's time to go to war. you better be prepared to do anything and eveyrthing neccesary to win!

if that is not what you ar eprepare dot do. let north korea be alone!



with a hydrogen bomb only the north korean die if it is exactly placed. instead of us soldiers and south koreans and china!

sometimes you just gotta drop the bomb.

just like sometimes you gotta shoot a guy in the head.


i do not want war. after trumps announcement the stock market dipped. and i did lose some money.
so i rather have a quick clean 1 bomb war. then a long drawn out 10 year war

Holy crap this is some supremely dumb turds.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[DutchJazzer]

If we have any left we'll just drop some on the freeky deeky dutch, just for funzies, then take out Isreal because that one is complicated too. Basically, let's just genocide all over until we have nothing but simple issues left to deal with.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

Israel is not threatening the us of a. north korea is threatening and posturing all over the us of a. while showing of the weapons and bombs every few time.

if a madman threatens to murder you, you should not kill him. but if he threatens to murder you while waving a gun and firing bullets in the air. posturing with his arsenal of guns. you just gotta put a bullet in between his eyes. and go out and eat a steak!

telling me after bombing north korea we would bomb israel. is like saying because i told you to shoot someone in the head if he enters your home in the middle of the night. but instead you go just murder some random neighbor in your home!

 

[Miggs]

when it's time to go to war. you better be prepared to do anything and eveyrthing neccesary to win!

if that is not what you ar eprepare dot do. let north korea be alone!



with a hydrogen bomb only the north korean die if it is exactly placed. instead of us soldiers and south koreans and china!

sometimes you just gotta drop the bomb.

just like sometimes you gotta shoot a guy in the head.


i do not want war. after trumps announcement the stock market dipped. and i did lose some money.
so i rather have a quick clean 1 bomb war. then a long drawn out 10 year war

Yeah, because our ongoing wars have been killing the stock market for the last 20 years.

 

[Gameface]

If the US pulls the nuclear trigger that solves one small immediate problem and creates a larger long term one.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Miggs]

Then, I'm hoping we ship all the blacks out somewhere. Back to Africa. Somewhere else we already bombed. Then nuke them. By that point, we might as well just do the job right.

This is satire btw. Just worried ppl are too dumb to recognize that.

 

[fishonjazz]

What a ****ing moron.

I need to seriously move. Is any corner of this world normal? Like, decent leadership, not too corrupt, solid employment and lifestyle possible?

Sounds like canada

 

[Beantown]

Glad I live on the east coast. Alaska, Hawaii and the west coast are ****ed.

 

[Red]

Quite the red line Trump has threatened Kim Jong Un not to cross. If you simply threaten, not attack, just threaten the US, we will nuke you. North Korea issues comical over the top threats every day. For years. That's what they do. So how does Kim respond to Trump? By threatening to throw missiles at Guam. How does Trump maintain credibility? He has to nuke North Korea. I don't expect Trump to nuke North Korea. I expect Trump to lose credibility. Brilliant man.

Did I see this movie before?

http://www.motherjones.com/politics...onald-trumps-fire-fury-threat-to-north-korea/

Oh, wait. I forgot. This is what God wants. God has given Trump the thumbs up:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-trump-pastor-north-korea-20170808-story.html

God's on our side. I feel better now....

 

[Red]

when it's time to go to war. you better be prepared to do anything and eveyrthing neccesary to win!

if that is not what you ar eprepare dot do. let north korea be alone!



with a hydrogen bomb only the north korean die if it is exactly placed. instead of us soldiers and south koreans and china!

sometimes you just gotta drop the bomb.

just like sometimes you gotta shoot a guy in the head.


i do not want war. after trumps announcement the stock market dipped. and i did lose some money.
so i rather have a quick clean 1 bomb war. then a long drawn out 10 year war

Trolls rush in, where angels fear to tread.

 

[The Thriller]

I'm not sure why we think we need to play a game of chicken with NK.

This isn't the Cuban missile crisis.

NK is literally fighting for survival as they're suffering from a terrible drought. Similar to the 90s when the regime was nearly toppled in a famine, the son is reacting in The same way as the father. He's talking big and showing off weapons.

Ship him a bag of food and pacify him.

But talking big won't work. He's not going to back down. His very survival depends on the United States acting like an *** and him standing up to it.

Fears over NK were overblown until today. In the past, it was clear that he'd only use nukes if he felt like he'd have no other choice.

Trump's saber rattling might make him feel like we're preparing for an attack. Truly, trump's "fire" and "fury" rhetoric is risky and increases the risks of provoking Kim to strike first. Again, nothing good comes out of talking big to NK. That's exactly what he needs for propaganda and survival.

 

[The Thriller]

If Americans bitched about Syrian refugees, then they're gonna love the millions of brainwashed Koreans living in the 1950s if war does occur. Regime change in NK would be the greatest humanitarian crisis the world has ever seen. Easily the # of refugees in the world would double. Unlike Syrians and Sudanese, North Koreans have been so brainwashed and so impoverished (they grow 5-6 inches shorter than their SK counterparts) that we'd tear through $5-$10 trillion to rebuild that country and undo the decades of brainwashing. NK is one of the few countries in the world more complicated than Iraq. And we all know how well regime change has gone over there...

Btw, don't expect china or SK to chip in. They aren't going to pay the bills for us breaking yet another country.

 

[The Thriller]

War w/NK would require Congress's approval.

Think trump really wants to be rebuked again by congress?
Think congress really wants to put their necks on the line for such a high risk zero reward war?

To me, this seems more like a cheap publicity stunt to distract from failing approval ratings. Either that our Dump really has temper problems.

Anyone know what our ambassador to SK thinks about this? Lol... could someone google who that is?

 

[Gameface]

I'm not sure why we think we need to play a game of chicken with NK.

This isn't the Cuban missile crisis.

NK is literally fighting for survival as they're suffering from a terrible drought. Similar to the 90s when the regime was nearly toppled in a famine, the son is reacting in The same way as the father. He's talking big and showing off weapons.

Ship him a bag of food and pacify him.

But talking big won't work. He's not going to back down. His very survival depends on the United States acting like an *** and him standing up to it.

Fears over NK were overblown until today. In the past, it was clear that he'd only use nukes if he felt like he'd have no other choice.

Trump's saber rattling might make him feel like we're preparing for an attack. Truly, trump's "fire" and "fury" rhetoric is risky and increases the risks of provoking Kim to strike first. Again, nothing good comes out of talking big to NK. That's exactly what he needs for propaganda and survival.

You can't really act like NK hasn't posed a threat. I mean, sure, not to the U.S., but NK has had the ability to shell Seoul with conventional weapons with a pretty assured killing of at least a few hundred thousand human beings, if not more than one million human beings in the FIRST HOUR OF CONFLICT. He has artillery in place on the NK side that is embedded into the mountains looking over Seoul. We do not have the ability to neutralize even most of it before it can be used, even if we strike first. Even if we "nuke" NK, we cannot nuke these installations without also nuking the capitol of SK.

Let me just say it again. #1 we cannot nuke our way out of millions of casualties in allied South Korea. We can't. #2 NK does NOT need to use nukes to kill over 1 million people in Seoul, South Korea, they have the conventional artillery in place in the mountains overlooking Seoul to absolutely devastate one of the largest cities in the world. Within the first few seconds of all out conflict many thousands of South Koreans would die, it would take no special direction from Kim Jung Un. We cannot root out theses artillery pieces that are buried in the mountains, very well fortified, quickly. For one, there are many installations. MANY! Second they are well protected and placed in heavy mountain terrain. #3 every couple seconds they launch another salvo into a densely populated city.

I'm pretty sure Un can set a human kind record for most people killed within an hour with non-nuclear weapons.

...And I haven't even mentioned that he also has nukes.

 

[Gameface]

War w/NK would require Congress's approval.

Think trump really wants to be rebuked again by congress?
Think congress really wants to put their necks on the line for such a high risk zero reward war?

To me, this seems more like a cheap publicity stunt to distract from failing approval ratings. Either that our Dump really has temper problems.

Anyone know what our ambassador to SK thinks about this? Lol... could someone google who that is?

The President can take military action without congressional approval.

 

[♪alt13]

Incentivize.

Cool you responded to my phone's predict a text.

Do you seriously think that we aren't monsters? Ask an Iraqi. Hell ask a Muslim. Ask them how America reacts to the slightest threat to its civilian population. We aren't the peaceful freedom loving agrarian society that we like to envision ourselves as. We are the empire, the beast, the machine. We are the Romans, the Persians, the British. We are xenophobic and racist and entitled and extremely violent(lack of commas was on purpose). Yes we can be peaceful, tolerant, and friendly(when we get our way and feel secure) but that's the story we want to tell ourselves. The truth of our actions tells an entirely different one. We secure peace through submission.

It is perhaps comforting to the national conscience to think that we would not sacrifice millions of Koreans but that's disengenuous. We would, we have, we will if it comes down to it.

Afterwards we will bemoan the unfortunate events that we were forced into playing a central role. We will convince ourselves that we were without choice. We will do this because we are not monsters. We are a peace loving people and we have the ammo to prove it.

I am glad that tensions are ratcheting up while there is still a way back. Let's all hope for some measure of resolution before Americans begin to taste fear.

 

[♪alt13]

I'm not sure why we think we need to play a game of chicken with NK.

This isn't the Cuban missile crisis.

NK is literally fighting for survival as they're suffering from a terrible drought. Similar to the 90s when the regime was nearly toppled in a famine, the son is reacting in The same way as the father. He's talking big and showing off weapons.

Ship him a bag of food and pacify him.

But talking big won't work. He's not going to back down. His very survival depends on the United States acting like an *** and him standing up to it.

Fears over NK were overblown until today. In the past, it was clear that he'd only use nukes if he felt like he'd have no other choice.

Trump's saber rattling might make him feel like we're preparing for an attack. Truly, trump's "fire" and "fury" rhetoric is risky and increases the risks of provoking Kim to strike first. Again, nothing good comes out of talking big to NK. That's exactly what he needs for propaganda and survival.

Kim's survival doesn't depend on fear of the US it depends on fear and worship of the Kim regime. Kim does not want our food, he wants our withdrawal.

 

[lauriandres]

You can't really act like NK hasn't posed a threat. I mean, sure, not to the U.S., but NK has had the ability to shell Seoul with conventional weapons with a pretty assured killing of at least a few hundred thousand human beings, if not more than one million human beings in the FIRST HOUR OF CONFLICT. He has artillery in place on the NK side that is embedded into the mountains looking over Seoul. We do not have the ability to neutralize even most of it before it can be used, even if we strike first. Even if we "nuke" NK, we cannot nuke these installations without also nuking the capitol of SK.

Let me just say it again. #1 we cannot nuke our way out of millions of casualties in allied South Korea. We can't. #2 NK does NOT need to use nukes to kill over 1 million people in Seoul, South Korea, they have the conventional artillery in place in the mountains overlooking Seoul to absolutely devastate one of the largest cities in the world. Within the first few seconds of all out conflict many thousands of South Koreans would die, it would take no special direction from Kim Jung Un. We cannot root out theses artillery pieces that are buried in the mountains, very well fortified, quickly. For one, there are many installations. MANY! Second they are well protected and placed in heavy mountain terrain. #3 every couple seconds they launch another salvo into a densely populated city.

I'm pretty sure Un can set a human kind record for most people killed within an hour with non-nuclear weapons.

...And I haven't even mentioned that he also has nukes.

Bulletproof, why are you 100% sure, that when NK leader says "Destroy the Seoul" then the actual soldiers who operate the artillery actually open fire? Some of course might.
Of course, the same applies to Trump? Or are you also saying that the POTUS has single administrative/root access to the US nuclear weaponry. I seriously doubt that it is so SIMPLE (nuclear weapon launching system is configured so that ONLY Trump has administrative access) i.e that nobody in the US Army won't have a clue or information when the Trump actually launches the missiles either with a single button or mouse click. Why to spread the fear?? Or is average US citizen really that silly that he/she believes that complex weapons can be operated by the single person.

 

[DutchJazzer]

If the US pulls the nuclear trigger that solves one small immediate problem and creates a larger long term one.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

hydrogen bomb does not have the long term problem!

 

[Stoked]

You're wrong, we are monsters. We have proven that we are time and time again all over the globe. Foreign civilian casualties will evaporate from the calculus when American citizens feel threatened. Jesus christ how many Koreans died only because we felt that the spread of Communism was a threat to us? How do you think we will react when we fear nukes from this tiny state? Answer: Regime change.

Kim is making a miscalculation. He is thinking himself and his nation more capable than they are. I think he thinks he can force a mutually assured destruction scenario similar to our cold war predicament with the USSR. NK is not the USSR and the USA has matured quite a bit as a military power since the sixties. This is a horribly unbalanced conflict that won't end in a stalemate.

...and we haven't even begun to talk about how allowing NK to have intercontinental ballistic missiles armed with nukes, because they already got em, would incentive every other little country we may want to destroy to follow suit.

Yes and no. We have proven that we are willing to put others in harms way, in the right conditions. It's calculated on a gain v loss scale.

But Seoul is a whole new ball game. It is a major world city. This is not some villages in central Africa or Afghanistan. It is the capital city of a major American ally. By sacrificing Seoul, America would cause fundamental damage to it's standing with it's allies. Possible fatal damage. It would be quite easy for our allies to think "If they sacrificed Seoul, a city of 25 million, why not us?". S. Korea also does not need to rely on American media to get the word out, they have the tech and infrastructure to do so themselves.

If Seoul is so readily sacrificed, why not Paris? Tokyo? Sydney? Brussels? Bucharest or Warsaw?

This would be a whole new level of monster and the world would take note. Allies would jump ship and rightfully so. Picking this fight is idiotic.