So... DeRozan? I don't know chit about trades really, but he seems like he could be a good fit. Cy, school me.
He was good last night... but they aren't giving him up for the package that was suggested and I think they may be the best team in the east if the cavs don't get it together.
DeRozan had his rare good shooting from three game against us. He can't shoot the three ball well though. If he ever does he will be pretty scary player. At this point I doubt he develops a three point shot though.I read about their starters having problems together in the playoffs, etc. DeRozan is 28 but it seems like he could still do well as he ages. Probably a pipe dream, but we need scoring and he could deliver.
Living in Toronto I watched Derozan grow up and turn into an all-star. He is one of the best mid range shooters in the league if not the best one. He can slash and finish in most situations. He can hit the 3 too but that ain't his forte. If we had him he would have never pulled a Hayward
Sent from my ASUS_Z01BDC using JazzFanz mobile app
He was good last night... but they aren't giving him up for the package that was suggested and I think they may be the best team in the east if the cavs don't get it together.
Well said, I forgot to mention that. He has a high ft % and is also productive at the line.Another thing about DeRozen. The dude lives at the FT line.
I just think we have something very special in Donovan. And Rudy. I trust that they can get us really far with a few more key pieces. Can we get there with Faves, AB and Rodney?
Jazz can get down to about $64M by renouncing all free agents (which would include Favs, Hood and Exum), not picking up options for Sefolosha, Jerebko and Udoh and finding a trade partner for Burks.
I think this might what the "blow it up" proposal was for the OP, although I disagree on getting rid of Rubio.
To me, the key pieces for the Jazz to retain are Gobert, Mitchell and Rubio. Ingles is decent value at his salary and a great "glue" guy. I'd keep him in the rotation, although not necessarily as a starter. Bradley is a decent prospect, so try to keep him. If I were Lindsey, I'd also try to bring Sefolosha and Udoh back.
Main goal is to find starters at the 3 and 4, one coming as a free agent (or via trade) and one via the draft (or by trading our draft pick).
This is a great analysis, however. . . if the Jazz have decided to move on from Favors, Burks and/or Hood (doubtful) then they need to try to package them together at the deadline. Better to get something than to just renounce them.
This is a great analysis, however. . . if the Jazz have decided to move on from Favors, Burks and/or Hood (doubtful) then they need to try to package them together at the deadline. Better to get something than to just renounce them.
Living in Toronto I watched Derozan grow up and turn into an all-star. He is one of the best mid range shooters in the league if not the best one. He can slash and finish in most situations. He can hit the 3 too but that ain't his forte. If we had him he would have never pulled a Hayward
Sent from my ASUS_Z01BDC using JazzFanz mobile app
I don't think y'all understand what blow it up means. Blow it up means you trade away your best players.
Jazz can get down to about $64M by renouncing all free agents (which would include Favs, Hood and Exum), not picking up options for Sefolosha, Jerebko and Udoh and finding a trade partner for Burks.
I think this might what the "blow it up" proposal was for the OP, although I disagree on getting rid of Rubio.
To me, the key pieces for the Jazz to retain are Gobert, Mitchell and Rubio. Ingles is decent value at his salary and a great "glue" guy. I'd keep him in the rotation, although not necessarily as a starter. Bradley is a decent prospect, so try to keep him. If I were Lindsey, I'd also try to bring Sefolosha and Udoh back.
Main goal is to find starters at the 3 and 4, one coming as a free agent (or via trade) and one via the draft (or by trading our draft pick).