If Kanter is a game-changing big, you have to take him, but it all depends on how good he is. The Jazz just had the best PG in the league--a five-year veteran, All-Star and Olympian--and we still couldn't beat teams with talented length and explosive scorers. If the Jazz couldn't win with D.Will, then we're not going to win just because we have Brandon Knight. Even Kobe Bryant couldn't get out of the first round until the Lakers got Pau Gasol. They then went to the Finals three years in a row.
The game-changing big is tougher to get, and no one but Memphis or Minnesota is going to trade that kind of player away. No one but the Lakers are going to recruit that player as a free agent. So a team like the Jazz has to get a player like that in the draft. The Jazz can then pick up Jimmer, Josh Selby, or Reggie Jackson later in the draft and play Harris another couple of years.
The question is--how good is Enes Kanter? How does he fit with Derrick Favors? If he's the real deal then we have to take him, given the chance.
We also didn't win starting a center who wasn't defensive minded. Why should we pick Kanter? Every team in the final four of this year's playoffs has a SOLELY defensive minded center who doesnt give two **** about their offensive numbers (Chandler, Noah,Perkins, and to a lesser extent Anthony).