Not to jump off topic, but the same argument could be made for alcohol and deaths related to it.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/alcohol.htm
https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/homicide.htm
The number of drunk driving deaths each year in this country is similar to the number of gun related homicides every year, and the number of gun related homicides pales in comparison when you add the number of other alcohol related deaths.
After the passing of the 21st Amendment, alcohol received some constitutional protection (at least on a Federal level). I don't see a blanket prohibition ever happening again, just as I don't see it with guns, but I never understood that slap on the wrist people can get for a DUI, and in most states a DUI is a DUI, so a .08 conviction is the same as a .30 as far as a first time penalty. It makes me ill, but it is what it is.
A lot of people like to point out that other countries with strict gun laws or bans on guns have fewer gun deaths, etc. etc.
How about this? 31% of road related deaths in the U.S. are from drunk driving where .08 is the required Federal standard (states can be more strict, but will lose a ton of federal funding if they set the number above .08). In Germany for example, only 9% of road related deaths are related to alcohol where the legal limit is .05.