Utah Trade Deadline Discussion
- Thread starter LoPo
- Start date
Engorged On Unborn Gore
Well-Known Member
Meh. The Jazz can do better than that for Rodney.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Hell no to Gallo. Unless we're talking about Jerry Gallo.
You mean Jerry Callo?
freakazoid
Well-Known Member
Go away and stay there.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
What about getting the Detroit 1st instead of the Cavs' 1st?
So Burks and Favors for Gallinari and the Detroit 2018 1st. Is that worth the $22 million in 2019? Probably not. I wonder how much our FO loved Gallinari last summer.
Right. Callo with a C. Jerry Gallo's dead.
In any case, I think I'd rather have dead Jerry Gallo than D. Gallo.
Roy_McAvoy
Well-Known Member
I think the Clips are so desperate to dump Gallo's contract that you could do a lot better deal than that, and would need to be compensated more than that to bring him on.
Give us all those picks and Patrick Beverley and I'll take Gallo.
It's a rumor bud. KOC has reported it as a rumor, not speculation.
"The Pistons have dangled Stanley Johnson in trade conversations, including for Hood"
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y7wslt2w
That's the only player swap I'd do. They'd have to give picks. They wouldn't, but that's what I'd require if we took him on.
That's the only player swap I'd do. They'd have to give picks. They wouldn't, but that's what I'd require if we took him on.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
Other than the Detroit pick, what other assets do the Clippers have? I guess we could send them JoeJ instead of Favors in the hope that we can get something for Favors elsewhere.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
I don't think the jazz would have any interest in Gallo at 20million + over the next two years. It's not happening. Not the jazz way. Plus, he's injured and only played 11 games, and in those 11 games he hasn't been able to throw a basketball into the ocean. No thanks. Unless we are getting a chance to draft Porter or Young for taking on that bloated deal, jazz won't deal
I'd rather have Reggie Bullock than Stanley Johnson tbh.
LoPo
Well-Known Member
You are probably right. I'm not a Gallinari fan, but I know some are. I was pretty shocked to hear that the FO was trying to sign him last summer. He doesn't seem to be the guy to target, but I guess we just never know. I would only take him if we got a pick that was worth it.
Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
You can't have a lineup with Rubio, Gobert and Favors but you do.
I think you could, but Johnson would have to be a 4. It wouldnt be idea ltho.
At least with Bullock, we are replacing the shooting we lose on the wings from dealing Hood. He has enough size to play the 3 too (6'7 w/ a 6'10 wingspan). I just think Detroit would be hesitant to deal 2 wings to get 1 wing. They are alreay at a wing deficit (only have 5 on the roster, will only have 4 if they deal Johnson and Bullock).
LoPo
Well-Known Member
I think the following lineup could work: Rubio, Mitchell, Ingles, Johnson, Gobert. Sure, we lack a shooter just like with Favors, but Johnson's athleticism cutting, crashing, screening and rolling would be helpful. We would also be better on the break.