Not all gun shots are lethal. People get shot and walk away from it all the time. But what's the point of your post when I already said "Guns are just the most effective tool..."?
So, the people who keep saying "nobody wants to take your guns" are lying?No guns = Nobody gets shot. Prevented
My point is minimising their availability will change your world and make your life and your children's lives a hell of a lot safer. The lethality of a gun is a game changer in terms of escalating violence to the point where deadly force becomes regularised in the society. Other weapons don't have that effect on a situation, sure it may escalate things, a greater degree of violence my be used in order to subdue someone, worst i've seen is a broken arm or wrist but nobody is getting shot or having to make the choice to shoot somebody else.
If we are looking to increase the safety for me and my children guns are far down the list. Plenty of far bigger threats to them. Like car crashes (DUIs), America's growing weight problem, medical problems and drugs.
If safety is the goal there are far bigger risks. Not saying we shouldn't improve where we can but the media and social craze is wildly disproportionate. Why is that narrative pushed?
I don't speak for anybody but myself, and yes, I want to take all of your guns.So, the people who keep saying "nobody wants to take your guns" are lying?
Here's an idea. If you guys want gun reform, how about you all figure out what you really want first. It's beyond confusing hearing "nobody wants to take your guns" then the next person saying "No guns=Nobody get's shot".
I don't mean to come off as an *** but I have no clue what you all are really fighting for. In order to have this conversation there has to be some sort of foundation to what you are looking to do. Right now it's all over the place and impossible to comprehend as a gun owner.
Cause its easily preventable and something that is directly linked to legislation and the political system. Drugs and motor vehicle matters are too but not to the same degree, there is a direct correlation between gun control and dramatically lower gun deaths.
I don't speak for anybody but myself, and yes, I want to take all of your guns.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
And how do you plan on accomplishing this? Honest question.I don't speak for anybody but myself, and yes, I want to take all of your guns.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
But gun safety would prevent this...
Just saying. All of my guns are locked up, with the magazine or clip removed, the removed magazine or clip being empty, and none of my kids know the combination. Heck, my wife doesn't even know the combination. So it's not illogical to say that gun safety would've prevented this.
Still a terrible tragedy, and the blame goes on the parents.
And maybe one day the American people will start voting out the legislators that don't vote to their liking.
How does it protect your family from intruder then? Lets say somebody breaks in your house when you are not at home.... your wife will be calling you to ask the safe combination to unlock it and then ask how to load the magazine? By that time it's too late.
How do I, safetydan, plan on taking everybody's guns? That's a good question.And how do you plan on accomplishing this? Honest question.
Thanks!Good luck with that.
I sense sarcasm. Solid tactic in discussions. I stand by my original comment that the anti-gun folk don't have any plan whatsoever or truly know what they are after. I don't mean that rudely but it's true.How do I, safetydan, plan on taking everybody's guns? That's a good question.
I think I'll start from corner of the country, like the northeast corner of Maine,and start hitting houses one by one. There's no way to know if somebody owns a gun or not so Ill have to check every house just in case. I'll check back in weekly to show you my progress.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I sense sarcasm. Solid tactic in discussions. I stand by my original comment that the anti-gun folk don't have any plan whatsoever or truly know what they are after. I don't mean that rudely but it's true.
There will still be guns. LEOs, private security and some gov. employees will still have them. Not to mention the illegal trade. If guns are banned the gun traffic that comes north from the southern border would be massive. There will never be a scenario where there are no guns in the US.
Edit: That doesn't even mention home made firearms and 3D printing...
Sorry, I missed this. Yes, eliminating guns entirely is impossible. I wasn't speaking to that. Just the simple concept that "no guns = no shooting deaths. I'm glad you agree. Would it also be safe to assume that you agree with the concept that a decrease in gun availability would equal less gun violence?
At this point probably not as the market is already at full saturation. You won't decrease availability. Look at Chicago.
If we are talking grand hypotheticals were suddenly guns are hard to come by (ignoring confiscation, homemade versions, securing the border, sudden compliance of the gun rights crowd) then yeah they'd go down.
If food was less plentiful it would be harder to die from obesity related illnesses.