you really think they'd move the meter ??
I'd rather take my chances on the possibility of signing a big time free agent by letting Favors go. Signing Favors long-term kills the options we have to improve the team and basically says we're just happy to be 3/4/5 in the west every year.
Those guys are all about the same tier as Favors. I guess its arguable they fit in better because they are better shooters but they also all lack rim protection and rebounding that makes Favors good for us. Niko is probably the only one I would trade Favors for if contracts were all equal. Harris I would have to think more about.you really think they'd move the meter ??
or .. you could let go a really good player who can do a lot of good things for you for some vague notion of a marquee free agent signing that probably won't ever happen
I agree with this. Either get Favors on a good deal or get him on a 1 year deal or 1 and 1 with a team option and over pay him. It would be best if it was a good deal that started higher and went down by as much is allowed each year. I dont know all the rules on that.God I wish Favors would agree to be a nicely paid backup center and ‘certain lineups’ guy. I’d give the dude 5 years if if was only $8 million annually. Become a lifer who is modestly paid. Not a bad end for Favors career, he’s smart, won’t go broke, still make millions, and he knows he’d be happy in Utah. Nothing would make me happier than Favors coming along for the championship quest. But that quest would be massively held back if you keep trying to make Favors a 4 and pay him to be a high end starter. $15 million? I mean if no one ends up coming I’d give him that for a year I guess. But I’d want that cap space in 2019. If Favors can get a multi year deal where he sucks up 15% of all the free agency money available in the whole league then he should go for it.
Both otherwise come anchor the offense in Rudy’s bench minutes, be ready if there is an injury, and start working on your bench hype celebrations. We goin places
Those guys are all about the same tier as Favors. I guess its arguable they fit in better because they are better shooters but they also all lack rim protection and rebounding that makes Favors good for us. Niko is probably the only one I would trade Favors for if contracts were all equal. Harris I would have to think more about.
I think that team can beat GSW.A Beverly or a Harris won’t push us past the Rockets or Warriors. But a George might.
He has been a good 3 point shooter over the last 3 years. I dont see the good defense but I have not watched a ton on him. He isnt a good rebounder and there are some other things I dont like about him. But if we lost Favors he would be a decent option to pursue. I would prefer Gordon or even Jabari over him personally but they are probably not attainable by us either.i haven't seen him play heaps but if Harris is a decent shooter and defender he holds some appeal.
you really think they'd move the meter ??
I think that team can beat GSW.
Rubio / Beverley / Exum
Mitchell / Royce / Allen
Ingles / Crowder / Thabo
Harris / Jerebko
Gobert / Udoh
If Durant or Curry is hurt I agree. Or if Exum or Royce take a big jump and Mitchell, Rubio and Gobert keep improving.I think that team can beat GSW.
Rubio / Beverley / Exum
Mitchell / Royce / Allen
Ingles / Crowder / Thabo
Harris / Jerebko
Gobert / Udoh
I think that team can beat GSW.
Rubio / Beverley / Exum
Mitchell / Royce / Allen
Ingles / Crowder / Thabo
Harris / Jerebko
Gobert / Udoh
Correct. If Bradley sprained his ankle, then it gives more time for Udoh, and allows us to win with rim protection.Will need an ankle sprain... but almost every team needs GS to have an ankle sprain.
Just look at the Charlotte/Brooklyn trade. Guys, a team just took $17 million in 2019 to avoid $7 million in 2018/19 salary so they could avoid twice that in luxury. The luxury tax is massive for some of these teams. There is no telling what we could get if we had Burks + $10 million in cap space. Considering we would be one of 3 teams in the entire league with that type of asset, we could get a massive future asset for our troubles.