So you think we didnt sign Brook Lopez or Noah Vonleh (who has been trash until this year, so again with hindsight) because we kept our 3rd string PG?
U asking me if I can read a 89-96 loss to a Magic team that isn't very good into "a step in the right direction"? then no. I don't think I could read at your level.
Have you watched the Jazz before the ten games or nah? Because if you had, which I doubt you did, then you would have noticed there was a big slip in defensive efficiency to start the season. Am I being weird for being positive because our defense has been trending towards elite in the past ten games?
Alright man, you're an idiot. It's fine.
Well, financially speaking yes. Neto is getting paid more than those guys. And all these guys can play quality minutes, and Neto can't. He's looked like "he had been done" and missed over half of the games so far due to injuries. Yet he's getting 11 mpg when he does play simply because Quin ran out of players to give the minutes to, not because he's good or anything.
I have watched every ****ing game from start to finish. Yes, defensive intensity has improved, this I will admit but unless you can put the damn ball in the hoop you will still lose 100 out of 100 times. All the other team has to do is make one more basket than you. Shut them down to a league leading 45 baskets a game but only make 44 yourself and guess what? You lose. Are you too obtuse to recognize this?
You've completely contradicted yourselves in your various arguments, and yet, I'm supposed to be the idiot.
Where?
Why are you trying so hard to be stupid?
Wow, resorting to insults to any who disagree with you is so last year. Let me use one if my Masters Degrees tobtry abd explain. The Jazz have been amazing in a few games, putting up huge scores at staggering efficiency (Like the GS game), however they have clapped the bed in many games also. The 53.2% is an average. If I shoot 100% in one game and 0% in the next, I’m shooting 50% and you my friend would claim I was good? If anything, the good shooting games are the outliers, hence our record. However, at your insistance. I will take my dumbass brain and forget about how statistics can lie.
There's been 30 games...
It’s all good it’s only a game and good to see Jazz fans passionate, even if we all disagree.
1....Jazz will again be approaching 10 games below .500 and at that point it is time to come to reality. The run that happened last year was historical. It isn’t happening again people. Jazz needed to win a game like today if they are good. They are not. Time to come to terms with that. It amazes me how some of you act like this is freaking out or something. There’s a very good chance in the next 10 games Jazz will find themselves close to 10 games below .500. Coming back from that would take another huge run. I’ve looked at their schedule from January-April. Good luck with making that run again.
It was still an inaccurate analogy since in your example you used a two game sample size (I'm going to assume that you're taking the same amount of shots in each game to get to your 50% since you claim to be using a masters degree for that) when the Jazz season has been a 30 game sample size and much more varied than your example.
