homeytennis
Well-Known Member
When the Jazz went on their run last year they shot well even Bricky Ricky. If they don't do that again hello lottery.
Oh, and Gobert came back from injury.When the Jazz went on their run last year they shot well even Bricky Ricky. If they don't do that again hello lottery.
The Jazz actually shot better from 3 last year in the first half of the season (Before January 1st) than they did post January 1st. So you're wrong.When the Jazz went on their run last year they shot well even Bricky Ricky. If they don't do that again hello lottery.
Russell Another slow unathletic player just what the jazz needD'Angelo Russell. Go get him. The Nets have to be wavering on him right now just like Washington was wavering on Oubre.
Take Crabbe (who I think we could trade later). Send an unprotected 1st. I don't care. Go get somebody we can get excited about.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Yeah, I'd have to agree with you. Russell is a guy who is on fire from mid-range right now. He's a good shooter, but a lot of that seems unsustainable. He is terrible at getting to the FT line, like unfathomably bad. His combo of high usage and low free throw rate is as close to an automatic turnoff as it gets. He might be more of a 6th man than a starter. He's playing like Rodney Hood who passes a bit more but holds the ball longer.Russell Another slow unathletic player just what the jazz need
He would actually compliment Donovan and the others quite well. He is going for 17.5, 6 and 4 right now on a team that doesn't have a Donovan or Ingles. http://m.espn.com/nba/playerseasonstats?season=2019&playerId=3136776&teamId=17Russell Another slow unathletic player just what the jazz need
he is 5X better player than Exum.Russell Another slow unathletic player just what the jazz need
Honestly, I'm not convinced at that. When you really look at his advanced stats and shot selection, it's worrying.he is 5X better player than Exum.
Ok if you say so. He's been given every chance to get those stats. Dante has never been given a chance except stand in the corner!!! I actually heard Russell isn't a efficient player according to what Locke said with his numbers. But quin loves slow unathletic players so I wouldn't be surprised. I must say ingles is slow but he's really good though. But he's an exceptionhe is 5X better player than Exum.
So you love and want Dinwiddie but question Russell. You dont question Dinwiddie's team but you do question Russell's. Both on the same team.And honestly, I don't even know if I would do that. Russell could get overpaid. It's a Rodney Hood situation right now for the Nets. His stats are inflated on a bad team where they need his usage, so he puts up better counting stats.
I will hit unmute to respond to this:So you love and want Dinwiddie but question Russell. You dont question Dinwiddie's team but you do question Russell's. Both on the same team.
C'mon man
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
He would actually compliment Donovan and the others quite well. He is going for 17.5, 6 and 4 right now on a team that doesn't have a Donovan or Ingles. http://m.espn.com/nba/playerseasonstats?season=2019&playerId=3136776&teamId=17
The guy isn't crazy athletic, but he is good in the PnR and plays with guys in Brooklyn who are far inferior to what we have:
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
I get what you mean, but it's not so much about bad teams not being as bad this year as it is about the Jazz being a much better team when they actually get to play at home, and prior to these three losses on the road (Spurs was a bad one) they were 9 - 7 while slowly improving their home record closer to .500 after a bad start at home.The problem with getting so far behind over the next stretch is you need to go 5-1 on stretches like that. I’m not going to say the Jazz are definitively better than the Lakers anymore. Clippers could get them. Even going 4-2 there wouldn’t be great, especially when you’re losing to teams you’re fighting for a spot with. We’ll see. Some of you are hoping they go on this huge run again when the problem is a lot of the bad teams who would just roll over at the end of last year aren’t as bad this year and will be wanting a playoff spot, even bad eastern conference teams. They’re putting themselves in a position they have to play perfect and win games they aren’t supposed to, which they haven’t done.
I agree the schedule has something to do with the Jazz record. However they are losing to teams they need to make and win in the playoffs. Their home record is embarrassing and is a major concern because there is no evidence that they will just start turning it on at home and go on a winning streak.I get what you mean, but it's not so much about bad teams not being as bad this year as it is about the Jazz being a much better team when they actually get to play at home, and prior to these three losses on the road (Spurs was a bad one) they were 9 - 7 while slowly improving their home record closer to .500 after a bad start at home.
Jazz have a -1.8 net rating on the road, they're a +3.0 at home. The Jazz' true shooting % is 54.7% on the road, 58.5% at home. You can argue that these are normal for NBA teams to play better at home than on the road and I agree, but then it kinda comes back around to the point of the schedule being the hardest schedule for any team in the league right now as the Jazz have played 19 games on the road but only 11 at home so far. The Jazz have also played in 5 B2Bs already and they have only had one three game homestand the entire season.