Who should be our starting SF?
- Thread starter Beantown
- Start date
great idea!
David Ginola 14
Well-Known Member
Hayward....no doubt...
So you ARE content playing a guy who sucks at SF because he's an undersized PF? Makes perfect sense.
Former Member
Banned
I disagree I would rather have Millsap because he's shorter and works harder and stuff....
You know, you may be right. AK and CJ may not be good and are potentially pre-cancerous, but hey, they're SFs, right?
If we resign AK, then AK for sure. If we don't, either Miles or Burks, I would probably go with Miles.
enchilada_style
Well-Known Member
Millsaps peak value for the Jazz is at PF as a 6th man not as a SF experiment. If he doesn't want to be a 6th man, the next best thing in terms of value is to trade him for a legit SF. I would like to see an attempt to snag Batum if possible.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
I want to see if Millsap can play the 3 against most opposing starters. I agree some will give him problems, but if Millsap remains w/ the Jazz they could go smaller and use Hayward at SF in those instances. With Paul's shooting skills, I think he can be a big 3. That's the direction this team is headed - try to create size mismatches. Hayward-Favors-Millsap (at SF): those guys would be able to post up against almost all opponents. Jefferson isn't 7'0" but with his inside game he plays bigger on offense. Kanter is a big, physical presence. Burks is a tall SG. Jazz are going to be formidable on offense if the young guys develop.
Millsap also gives the Jazz the flexibility to go smaller at the 4 when needed. Also believe we should pick up CJ's option. It's likely the Jazz get a SF in next year's draft or via trade. Most FA's are going to want a multi-year deal. CJ is the perfect bridge and he also has value as a trading chip at the deadline, either as an expiring contract or as a wing for a contender. I think the Jazz could get the same value for him as they did for Ronnie Brewer (a 1st-round pick).
Whether or not the Jazz keep Millsap, I just don't think they should spend the money on an extra player. Fill the position with CJ/Millsap until next year's draft. Then they either get a rookie SF if/when they draft or make a trade to move up or get a veteran SF.
Derrick Williams would be the last type of SF I would be worried about him guarding. I'd be more worried about Wilson Chandler, Grant Hill, Batum,etc. SF's who aren't all the great, but their speed advantage on Millsap is going to be enough to make them seem a lot better than they are, potentially. We all know Durant and Lebron are going to own him, but they own anyone, so it's not like it matters.
orangello
Well-Known Member
That is the smartest thing I have ever read about Millsap. He is the best PF in the game coming off the bench and if not then he is an amazing trade chip that the Jazz can play with.
If Millsap were a starting three for any other team, especially if it were the Lakers or Thunder, and we had to go up against them in a playoff series we'd all be worried about how Millsap has us overmatched while we're sending AK and CJ out there against him. Yeah, Millsap can't guard LeBron or Durrant, but neither can the other two asshats.
Would you rather play Shawn Marion at PF or Jarron Collins?
Would you rather play Ronnie Brewer at PG or Milt Palacio?
Would you rather have Matt Harpring play C or Hasheem Thabeet?
Would you rather play Shawn Marion at PF or Jarron Collins?
Would you rather play Ronnie Brewer at PG or Milt Palacio?
Would you rather have Matt Harpring play C or Hasheem Thabeet?
Not that I don't think Millsap would be better for us off the bench, but let's make a list of teams Millsap wouldn't start for. Just because he isn't ideal and isn't 6'10" doesn't mean that we should go out and pick up a guy like Robin Lopez who's 7' and plays and rebounds like he's 6'4".
Spaniard
Well-Known Member
