What's new
By:

Singer Amy Winehouse found dead

TroutBum said:
My beef was with the American public dancing around and celebrating like they'd just won the world cup. My second beef was that Osama was very likely murdered. Ya, ya, he was a murderer, etc. but he deserved a fair trial. With the eyes of the world on the USA, we as a people/nation, dropped the ball and became the very thing we were fighting against.


I'm not celebrating her death at all, but just like Osama, it's better that she's dead; or in other words, good riddance. She was a burden to society, a very poor role model for her fans, and an all-around dead beat loser.



Wrong. I am all for death. I support the death penalty. I do not support murder in the name of "freedom", and I sure as hell don't support celebrity losers who write songs about how they said no to rehab, spit in the face of good sense and decency, and then killed themselves slowly with drugs. Again, good riddance.
Click to expand...

I believe they would have taken Osama alive, if they could have. But shot on the spot was probably the safest bet to lose the least amount of American lives.
 
TroutBum said:
I say good riddance. Her music sucked, her attitude sucked, her face sucked. She was in a position of fame, had many fans that were young and impressionable, and this is what she was all about. Congrats, you stupid ugly bitch.
Click to expand...

Great post. She reminds me of that idiot Steve Irwin. Position of fame, many fans young and impressionable, fed his baby to a croc.

Whoops, my bad. Steve Irwin was that respectable dumbass that used his infant son as a prop. No biggie. Too be honest, Obama should have killed him first.

(I Kid) ( love the Trout) (;
 
Last edited:
TroutBum said:
I'm not celebrating her death at all, but just like Osama, it's better that she's dead; or in other words, good riddance. She was a burden to society, a very poor role model for her fans, and an all-around dead beat loser.
Click to expand...

Do you believe that you, TroutBum, are worthy of judging who should live or die? Personally, I don't think any individual should be making such judgments.

How was she a burden to society? She was certainly financially independent. She made money for record companies and sound engineers, not to mention however many crew members she paid for live performances. She was surely a bad role model, but so am I. Do you think I should die for not setting a better example for children?

How well did you know her that you know she was an "all-around dead beat loser"? Do you think all losers should die early? Do you think all addicts should die early? Do you think the world would be a better place if those who compulsively seek out drugs at the expense of their health and well-being should die early? If so, do you think we should just speed up the process by just killing them all off?

Wouldn't it make more sense to help people with such terrible problems, rather than taking pleasure in their deaths?

If an overweight person was stuffing their face in a restaurant, and choked on their steak, should they be given the heimlich maneuver? After all, they made the choice to over eat. They are a burden to society with their increased health care costs. They put pressure on airlines and movie theaters to accommodate their greater than normal girth. They made the choice to shove food in their mouth without chewing properly. Why should society help them dislodge that chunk of steak? **** them, they deserve to die.
 
LogGrad98 said:
What does your constituency think about that position?
Click to expand...

Describe, "Position" please.

Secondly, according to MillHopper, voters are dumb so why would they care?

Thirdly, I still stand by my guns; the world is better off with this idiot gone.
 
For the record, the many questions were not meant to be answered. They were a simple rhetorical too*.

I may not post a whole lot, but I know better than to think I'll get a substantive response out of TroutBum. He's one of those people who seems not only content, but proud to be a ****ing moron.

*I meant "rhetorical style".
 
Last edited:
porqsmith said:
For the record, the many questions were not meant to be answered. They were a simple rhetorical too.

I may not post a whole lot, but I know better than to think I'll get a substantive response out of TroutBum. He's one of those people who seems not only content, but proud to be a ****ing moron.
Click to expand...

This, I cannot deny.

But really, were you looking for a "substantive response" to your "rhetorical too"? I can accommodate an answer if that's what you're really going for. In the future, don't expect "Substantive responses" to your rhetorical questions, that's just silly.
 
How well did you know her that you know she was an "all-around dead beat loser"? Do you think all losers should die early? Do you think all addicts should die early? Do you think the world would be a better place if those who compulsively seek out drugs at the expense of their health and well-being should die early? If so, do you think we should just speed up the process by just killing them all off?
Click to expand...

TroutBum said:
To answer all of your questions: Yes.
Click to expand...

TroutBum said:
Describe, "Position" please.
Click to expand...

This.
 
TroutBum said:
This, I cannot deny.

But really, were you looking for a "substantive response" to your "rhetorical too"? I can accommodate an answer if that's what you're really going for. In the future, don't expect "Substantive responses" to your rhetorical questions, that's just silly.
Click to expand...

Woops, "rhetorical style". Not sure how that happened.

Perhaps my point was lost in the typo - I did not expect a substantive response so I used a rhetorical style that did not encourage one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top