So, you're quoting the guy who, by ignoring regulations and going off ill-informed conclusions, almost got his ship destroyed? Seems appropriate.
The official "let's impeach Trump" thread
- Thread starter colton
- Start date
So, you're quoting the guy who, by ignoring regulations and going off ill-informed conclusions, almost got his ship destroyed? Seems appropriate.
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
Kill someone. Hmmm, ok.
I'm guessing Trump didn't do that. Or did he?
Marie's testimony today is all about Trump firing her. Are you saying that Trump should not have fired her? I haven't heard you say that so I am assuming that you are not.
You have, however, said that her testimony is powerful.
She's another dud, just as I said she would be. She made no solid accusation of an impeachable offense. She just whined that her feelings were hurt.
JazzyFresh
Banned
Can any of you go into more detail about this? Where and when did Trump personally threaten her? What kind of threats? Is there any audio or video?
Did someone claim Trump was engaging in witness tampering by tweeting about Yavonovitch? Do you have so much trouble addressing actual complaints that you have to make stuff up to rebut?
JazzyFresh
Banned
Christopher Stevens was killed because of a video tape and morons are sad that a lady got legally fired. Wow.
Asked and answered yesterday.
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
You do realize that Star Trek is just fiction and not historical documents....?
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
You asked for an example I gave you one. You're welcome
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
Well, have articles of impeachment been written? Have they taken a vote on impeach or not?
Well then, there is no impeachment.
They haven't even voted to start the inquiry yet.
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
Oh it was a good one. Thanks for setting me straight.
But uh, even if Trump fired her because she wouldn't obey his order to kill someone, he can still fire her.
He could be prosecuted for ordering the hit, but not for firing her.
She could be rehired by the next president. But she does not automatically get her job back
The president has sole power to hire and fire ambassadors. That's it.
Last edited:
JazzyFresh
Banned
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
/Impeachment
/Impeachment
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I guess Pelosi didn't think it was impeachable. So I guess it was nothing. 2 years of wasted time.
Yet people keep bitching about it.
I'd love to hear what you consider evidence for this.
What would be evidence for extortion that would not rely on witness testimony? Can you give an example?
I do, and I'm not the one quoting Star Trek in this discussion. Were you intending to criticize yourself?
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
Still gotta have evidence. Can't just say, "HE EXTORTED" and get a conviction.
porcupinetree
Well-Known Member
I don't know what your beef is. What is the problem with quoting a movie?
That vote was on November 2. How many lies do you intend to repeat today?
Conservatives keep bitching about the Mueller investigation, even thought it had a much better conviction/time spent ratio that Starr's investigation. I'm fine with it.
Also, 'not impeachable' <> 'nothing'.
None. Where did I indicate a problem? I brought up what I thought was an amusing parallel between the speaker of the quote and the POTUS you are defending.