Engorged On Unborn Gore
Well-Known Member
What are your grades for the gobert and Mitchell trades?As long as we still suck the KO deal isn't a catastrophe. Its a C- deal... the THT is an F.
What are your grades for the gobert and Mitchell trades?As long as we still suck the KO deal isn't a catastrophe. Its a C- deal... the THT is an F.
For me, it's A and B+, respectively.What are your grades for the gobert and Mitchell trades?
I agree with the B+. But Gobert is beyond an A.For me, it's A and B+, respectively.
The Gobert trade was much much worse than the Mitchell trade
From who's POV?The Gobert trade is going to go down in history as one of the worst trades of all-time.
That won't be decided until the pics are managed.The Gobert trade was much much worse than the Mitchell trade
It wont be decided yet you yourself made judgements on which trade was better?That won't be decided until the pics are managed.
But until that happens, there's no one on the planet who expected the Jazz to obtain that type of pick haul for Gobert. It is an unprecedented trade.
Is this another case of everyone is allowed to have an opinion except when it doesnt agree with my opinion type thing?
A and A-What are your grades for the gobert and Mitchell trades?
Pretty good grade average on the classes that matter (English and Math).A and A-
In some ways it’s an F… it has yet to produce a future asset which should be our focus (converting players with value now for future value). It still has potential to bring value later and at least doesn’t add a future liability.I think you’re giving it a C- because you’re favoring THT as an F. THT deal is terrible, for sure. But if you get a 40% in a class, it’s still the same F as someone who got 60%, even if they are fairly far apart. They were both Fs. Different percentiles of bad but both Fs.
Sure, but show me any potential Bogey trade that makes us better than having Olynyk. Getting worse would have been a byproduct of any asset move for Bojan. Unless we’re saying hanging on to him for longer compromises the tank, to which I’d say that they haven’t sufficiently gutted the team as is, if that’s the goal.In some ways it’s an F… it has yet to produce a future asset which should be our focus (converting players with value now for future value). It still has potential to bring value later and at least doesn’t add a future liability.
They also may not be looking at this team situation the same as us. We want no good players back so we can tank… if you are just looking player for player it’s bad but it’s not F bad. If you were looking at it as two years of KO for 24M vs 1 year of Bogey for 19.5 then maybe it’s okay to get the worse player?
That’s why it’s a c- in my grade book.
Ehh. I think the odds are good in the later part of the decade that we'll start seeing good returns.There's a chance the Gobert doesnt produce a single "plus" starter.
At least the Mitchell trade likely has at least one in Markkanen.
I will pray for the downfall of Cleveland everyday.Ehh. I think the odds are good in the later part of the decade that we'll start seeing good returns.
Ehh. I think the odds are good in the later part of the decade that we'll start seeing good returns.
I’ve been thinking about that a lot. The return on Donovan fits better around Gobert than what we had AND got us assets down the road.Hard for me to grade because I would love to see some combination of the assets we got with our non Rudy trades and see them suit up with Rudy. That would be a season to look forward to. And for anyone who follows the draft, Cy is correct in his assessment of the Rudy deal. It might be great but the odds of getting someone as good as Rudy in return are not great.
We will start reaping benefits of the Gobert trade immediately with a pick in the teens this year.