What's new

2023 NBA Draft Megathread

He at least looks OK/natural ball in hand. I wanted to be a Jordan Walsh truther but after watching him it's just all kinds of awkward to the point where I don't see a ton of room for growth. I see room for growth with Rupert.
Yeah man, I've tried to hard to like Walsh but he does almost nothing good beyond defend.
 
What do you guys consider the cut off for 'we got an elite type prospect'. Let's take Scoot and Victor of the board, so #3-#? how many players get you saying 'Jazz did enough tanking to get a pick good enough that we potentially got an awesome player.

I don't know anything, but starting to recognize names and definitely know the type of player I'm looking for. So I could definitely get excited about Black for example. He's #10 on Tankathon. #3-#10
Thompson
Miller
Thompson
Smith Jr.
Walker
George
Whitmore
Black

With #11 being Gradey Dick. Dick would definitely feel like a tier below the kind of prospect I'd want (I don't know anything). Back to the original question, how many of those dudes get you hyped about being our top pick? Is it just Miller or a Thompson twin? Are there dudes you would add to the list? How close does this board lineup with your own?


Here's how I see the prospects in a normal draft:

Generational: Wemby

Top 1: Scoot

Top 5: Brandon Miller

Top 8: Jarace, Cam Whitmore

Everyone else....I'm not sure I would see them as surefire top 8 picks in a standard draft. IMO, this draft is condensed around the 8-16 range because there are a lot of guys that have fallen down or risen up to that draft stock.

Thompson Twins: Impossible to evaluate 20 year olds playing against high school kids. Their production is not particularly impressive at all.

Smith Jr/George: Shotmakers/creators....but not particularly amazing at it. Tough to judge because NCAA basketball is so terrible....but their playstyle is a tough living in the NBA.

Wallace/Black: Similarity prospects, likely role players in the NBA. Black is more exciting, Wallace is a better player right now.

Dick/Sensabaugh/Jett: These guys have had good seasons and it would not be surprised if they were draft above the guys listed above.
 
i watched Arkansas last night, they inserted NSJ about mid way through the first half - he played about 5 minutes and honestly was unplayable and he never saw the court in a close game the rest of the way. granted, it was just his second game back from injury, but he looked so bad. he's going to be interesting to watch the rest of the way, but Arkansas is on the ropes a bit - they need to win games right now to guarantee a spot in the dance.
 
Yeah man, I've tried to hard to like Walsh but he does almost nothing good beyond defend.
also a good cutter/finisher, pretty good passer and plays smart - there is a reason (beyond just the defense) musselman plays him a ton in tight games. type of guy who could be a really good four year player, but yeah, i'm the same - i wanted to like him, but he just isn't anything special with the ball and the three still isn't falling - just don't see him as an nba prospect right now.
 
What do you guys consider the cut off for 'we got an elite type prospect'. Let's take Scoot and Victor of the board, so #3-#? how many players get you saying 'Jazz did enough tanking to get a pick good enough that we potentially got an awesome player.

I don't know anything, but starting to recognize names and definitely know the type of player I'm looking for. So I could definitely get excited about Black for example. He's #10 on Tankathon. #3-#10
Thompson
Miller
Thompson
Smith Jr.
Walker
George
Whitmore
Black

With #11 being Gradey Dick. Dick would definitely feel like a tier below the kind of prospect I'd want (I don't know anything). Back to the original question, how many of those dudes get you hyped about being our top pick? Is it just Miller or a Thompson twin? Are there dudes you would add to the list? How close does this board lineup with your own?
Miller and Keyonte are the only two in that list with high floors and low bust potential for me, and also have similar upsides of Walker, or Cam, that are not a huge bust risk, but whos floors are lower depending on who drafts them. Thompsons are huge risk reward types since there is little to go on, but the ability to hoop is there, they are not ranked that high just based on max verts.
I like Black as a high level role player with a nice floor, but not much elite anything there, and think he is not a high upside type, Smith probably ins't either anymore with his injury history, same with the once top 5 ranked Whitehead. Black has a higher floor than both of them but its only because of the injuries.
I like Walker and Whitmore the most as having safe enough floors to take early but high enough potentials to not mind taking before the Thompsons if I have a nervous owner who is happy to replace me if they bust.
Personally think one of the twins becomes an elite level all nba player. Not sure which one though
 
What do you guys consider the cut off for 'we got an elite type prospect'. Let's take Scoot and Victor of the board, so #3-#? how many players get you saying 'Jazz did enough tanking to get a pick good enough that we potentially got an awesome player.

I don't know anything, but starting to recognize names and definitely know the type of player I'm looking for. So I could definitely get excited about Black for example. He's #10 on Tankathon. #3-#10
Thompson
Miller
Thompson
Smith Jr.
Walker
George
Whitmore
Black

With #11 being Gradey Dick. Dick would definitely feel like a tier below the kind of prospect I'd want (I don't know anything). Back to the original question, how many of those dudes get you hyped about being our top pick? Is it just Miller or a Thompson twin? Are there dudes you would add to the list? How close does this board lineup with your own?


What? Is Cade not awesome? And isn't Black good on defense? So Cade on offense with good defense upside? Cade was putting up 20/6/6...
highest ceilings, imo, are miller, whitmore, walker and george.
 
What do you guys consider the cut off for 'we got an elite type prospect'. Let's take Scoot and Victor of the board, so #3-#? how many players get you saying 'Jazz did enough tanking to get a pick good enough that we potentially got an awesome player.

I don't know anything, but starting to recognize names and definitely know the type of player I'm looking for. So I could definitely get excited about Black for example. He's #10 on Tankathon. #3-#10
Thompson
Miller
Thompson
Smith Jr.
Walker
George
Whitmore
Black

With #11 being Gradey Dick. Dick would definitely feel like a tier below the kind of prospect I'd want (I don't know anything). Back to the original question, how many of those dudes get you hyped about being our top pick? Is it just Miller or a Thompson twin? Are there dudes you would add to the list? How close does this board lineup with your own?


What? Is Cade not awesome? And isn't Black good on defense? So Cade on offense with good defense upside? Cade was putting up 20/6/6...
Ok Cade is awesome as an empty stat tank commander?
CC is pretty overrated and yes Black is a smart defender,and play reader. but thats it. Being smart I guess is good enough for some of you. It is something to build on, but with those ****** handles and meh jumper, I don't see a place for him in Hardy's rotation let alone starting.
 
cade is so much more dynamic as a shooter/scorer than black is. black is the more steady player, won't turn it over as much, better defender than Cade. giddey is a more appropriate comp for black.
it wasnt a damn comp. The point I was TRYING to make, was Cade went to high for what he is as a pro. Black is like you say, even less of a prospect so I guess I was being generous smh
 
The point I was TRYING to make, was Cade went to high for what he is as a pro.
I think that is enough to get people to disagree. Who should have gone over him? You want empty stats and no impact, Jalen Green is your guy. There is definitely an argument for Mobley, but he hasn't been flawless either. Both he and Barnes slumped a bit this year, while Cade seemed to be doing well before his injury.

He's easily a top three player in that draft. And I haven't heard anyone say he was overdrafted or is a disappointing pick until this very morning.
 
I think that is enough to get people to disagree. Who should have gone over him? You want empty stats and no impact, Jalen Green is your guy. There is definitely an argument for Mobley, but he hasn't been flawless either. Both he and Barnes slumped a bit this year, while Cade seemed to be doing well before his injury.

He's easily a top three player in that draft. And I haven't heard anyone say he was overdrafted or is a disappointing pick until this very morning.
Franzzzzzz
 
The Detroit Pistons
I would look at Black starting around 16th overall based on his actual ceiling and maybe 12th based on his floor as a role player. If you catch my take.
imo he is being treated like he is in the same ceiling range as some of the best prospects in this draft. Cannot figure why, maybe I am missing something I just don't see much there to work with at all that I cannot get in a more proven Colby later on.
 
I would look at Black starting around 16th overall based on his actual ceiling and maybe 12th based on his floor as a role player. If you catch my take.
imo he is being treated like he is in the same ceiling range as some of the best prospects in this draft. Cannot figure why, maybe I am missing something I just don't see much there to work with at all that I cannot get in a more proven Colby later on.
I don't think anyone has put Black in their top 5....
 
I think that is enough to get people to disagree. Who should have gone over him? You want empty stats and no impact, Jalen Green is your guy. There is definitely an argument for Mobley, but he hasn't been flawless either. Both he and Barnes slumped a bit this year, while Cade seemed to be doing well before his injury.

He's easily a top three player in that draft. And I haven't heard anyone say he was overdrafted or is a disappointing pick until this very morning.
Its just me I hate Oklahoma state lol
no seriously I never liked Cades ****** handles and overrated shooting either
 
Back
Top