What's new
By:

Biden Supreme Court Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson

Al-O-Meter said:
#1 - Even your twisting isn't true. In the words of Stephen Colbert, it has truthiness but in reality it is only something racists repeat because they want it to be true. The color of someone's skin does not make them a good or bad doctor.
Click to expand...
I define "a good doctor" as someone who gives good medical care. A doctor can be a good doctor to one person and a bad doctor to another if the quality of medical care differs, as happens when white doctors treat white patients and black patients. I get that you don't know this, because none of your family is black and you have not invested any time in reading research on differential treatment of patients by race. If you want to expose your deep ignorance on the topic further, I certainly won't recommend you stop; you're an embarrassment to your race and your political views. However, I will recommend you do some research on the topic before posting on impulse.

Al-O-Meter said:
#2 - Careful attention to detail is the job description of the SCOTUS justices. KBJ is a racist and she's stupid. She is exactly who lefties want in that seat.
Click to expand...
Jackson is not a scientist nor mathematician, she's a lawyer. If you read them carefully enough, you'll find SCOTUS rulings are often imprecise on numerical issues, because they are all lawyers (as they should be), and their clerks are all lawyers (as they should be).

Were you genuinely confused about what Jackson intended to say?
 
One Brow said:
A doctor can be a good doctor to one person and a bad doctor to another if the quality of medical care differs, as happens when white doctors treat white patients and black patients.
Click to expand...
Got it. White doctors, apparently every white doctor who treats white patients and black patients, are incapable of providing an equivalent level of care to their patients because of the skin color of the doctor. Does your racism speak to the level of care Asian doctors are capable of providing?

One Brow said:
you're an embarrassment to your race
Click to expand...
Gawd. Anyone who uses that phrase as an insult pretty much outs themselves. Much like KBJ, I represent myself, thanks.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
Got it. White doctors, apparently every white doctor who treats white patients and black patients, are incapable of providing an equivalent level of care to their patients because of the skin color of the doctor.
Click to expand...
You said "every", not I, and the statistics speak for themselves. Thank you for continuing to embarrass yourself, your politics, and your race.

Al-O-Meter said:
Does your racism speak to the level of care Asian doctors are capable of providing?
Click to expand...
I haven't read the research on that.

Al-O-Meter said:
Gawd. Anyone who uses that phrase as an insult pretty much outs themselves. Much like KBJ, I represent myself, thanks.
Click to expand...
You are a human, aren't you? You're an embarrassment to the human race. If you thought I meant any other race, that's on you and your racism.
 
One Brow said:
No, the statistics reveal the racism Jackson and I are referring to.
Click to expand...
Neither KBJ or you were pointing out racism but rather an inherent ability owed to skin color, and it is no different from the arguments Dutch used to make except at least he used to actually post the statistics he claimed supported his racism.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
Neither KBJ or you were pointing out racism but rather an inherent ability owed to skin color,
Click to expand...
The inferior treatment black patients receive from non-black doctors, as opposed to black doctors, is a statistical fact. The difference disappears for the treatment of white patients. You're the one explaining this as an "inherent ability", I (and I'm sure Jackson also) attribute this to racism.

Al-O-Meter said:
and it is no different from the arguments Dutch used to make
Click to expand...
It's your interpretations that resemble DutchJazzer's, not mine.
 
How long until someone equates KBJ with the KGB?
 
One Brow said:
You are a human, aren't you? You're an embarrassment to the human race. If you thought I meant any other race, that's on you and your racism.
Click to expand...
Yes, but in his estimation, some people are more human than others.
 
One Brow said:
The inferior treatment black patients receive from non-black doctors, as opposed to black doctors, is a statistical fact. The difference disappears for the treatment of white patients. You're the one explaining this as an "inherent ability", I (and I'm sure Jackson also) attribute this to racism.
Click to expand...
That is not what KBJ wrote in her opinion, nor what she meant as that wouldn't make any sense in the context of the case at issue. The problem you describe could be addressed by taking steps to eliminate racism but KBJ's argument is the ability is intrinsic to skin color so that if doctors of the skilled skin color aren't present then people will die due to the lack of skill being present. KBJ is describing a thing that cannot be fixed by taking steps to eliminate racism, but can only be fixed by institutionalizing racism to increase the number of doctors of the skilled skin color. It is racism of the ugliest type, and to support the racist trope she used a fake statistic that even a 4th grader should see is wrong.

Play all the "what she really meant was..." and "she can't be expected to know 4th grade math because she's a lawyer..." games you want, but your interpretation is your interpretation. KBJ's dissent in this case, as she wrote it, is stupid and racist.
 
One Brow said:
A doctor can be a good doctor to one person and a bad doctor to another if the quality of medical care differs, as happens when white doctors treat white patients and black patients. I get that you don't know this, because none of your family is black and you have not invested any time in reading research on differential treatment of patients by race. If you want to expose your deep ignorance on the topic further, I certainly won't recommend you stop; you're an embarrassment to your race and your political views. However, I will recommend you do some research on the topic before posting on impulse.
Click to expand...
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH

Please cite sources racist.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
That is not what KBJ wrote in her opinion,
Click to expand...
It quite obviously is, once you get past the inelegant presentation of the numbers.

Al-O-Meter said:
nor what she meant as that wouldn't make any sense in the context of the case at issue.
Click to expand...
That is exactly the issue. Allowing more black doctors to be admitted improves medical care overall (which is a goal of a medical school) because there is a large subset of patients to whom they give better care. That's just one of the reasons DEI/affirmative action improves the overall quality of schools and professions.

Al-O-Meter said:
The problem you describe could be addressed by taking steps to eliminate racism
Click to expand...
Name five steps that could reasonably taken and that you would approve of.

Al-O-Meter said:
KBJ is describing a thing that cannot be fixed by taking steps to eliminate racism, but can only be fixed by institutionalizing racism to increase the number of doctors of the skilled skin color. It is racism of the ugliest type,
Click to expand...
Up and down are both directions, but they are very different when you're at the bottom of a 10' deep pool. Countering racism and fighting the power structure by giving the oppressed more chances is very different from supporting the power structure and keeping the oppressed down.

Al-O-Meter said:
KBJ's dissent in this case, as she wrote it, is stupid and racist.
Click to expand...
Your opinion of it certainly is.

Hax0rs said:
Please cite sources racist.
Click to expand...
Tell you what, I'll cite n different studies that support what I said, and you acknowledge I was correct implicitly (you don't even have to say it). You choose the size of "n", and then I'll decide if it's worth the bother.
 
One Brow said:
Tell you what, I'll cite n different studies that support what I said, and you acknowledge I was correct implicitly (you don't even have to say it). You choose the size of "n", and then I'll decide if it's worth the bother.
Click to expand...
You a joke racist
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top