What's new

Does Lauri Get Traded?

Does Lauri Get Dealt Before The Season Starts?


  • Total voters
    134
  • Poll closed .
It's going to be very difficult for our young guys to look good at all without Lauri.

This team without Lauri will be very difficult to watch aesthetically.
You forgot about Kenny. LOL yeah tanking isn't for the casuals. Good news is you can watch the games the next day instead of staying up late to watch them. The result will rarely be in question.
 
True, but they’d basically be back where they looked to be headed preseason 2022 - minus Conley, Olynyk, Vando, Beasley, NAW, Fontecchio and Lauri.

I'm very excited about the 2025 draft, and so I get it.

I don't think our our 2023 and 2024 draft picks will be able to develop as well without a guy like Lauri.
 
I'm very excited about the 2025 draft, and so I get it.

I don't think our our 2023 and 2024 draft picks will be able to develop as well without a guy like Lauri.
I agree. I also think that if you trade Lauri, you use your available cap space to sign some veteran guys to short term high dollar contracts to be stabilizing forces around a young roster. Guys like Kris Dunn, etc. But then you PLAY the young guys the bulk of the minutes.
 
I'm very excited about the 2025 draft, and so I get it.

I don't think our our 2023 and 2024 draft picks will be able to develop as well without a guy like Lauri.
The latter I do think is a valid concern. I'm a big advocate of developing your prospect alongside good players, and Lauri has a lot of aspects to his game that help them develop, including being a low usage guy who doesnt hog the ball.

Also with his humble team first attitude and hard work ethic he is a great exemplary star player to learn from.
 
The latter I do think is a valid concern. I'm a big advocate of developing your prospect alongside good players, and Lauri has a lot of aspects to his game that help them develop, including being a low usage guy who doesnt hog the ball.

Also with his humble team first attitude and hard work ethic he is a great exemplary star player to learn from.
I would absolutely prefer to keep him and build this young core around him - hoping to get lucky in a trade, signing or pick that opens things up to a contending window. We look at Mitchell and Gobert now, but they were the 27th and 13th picks in the draft. And they were clearly the lead dogs on a team that was flawed, but extremely successful.
 
I would absolutely prefer to keep him and build this young core around him - hoping to get lucky in a trade, signing or pick that opens things up to a contending window. We look at Mitchell and Gobert now, but they were the 27th and 13th picks in the draft. And they were clearly the lead dogs on a team that was flawed, but extremely successful.
Good thing about this ordeal is that there is almost zero pressure in dealing him.

So either we get a kings ransom, or the deal wont happen. Either option would be good for the Jazz.
 
Whatever is going on, nothing has happened, so I'm guessing the urgency isnt high. OKC bowing out of the Lauri race w/ the Hartenstein deal may make this less likely to happen than we all assume given its one less suitor to drive the price to Danny's taste.
 
Bogey would actually be a great guy to bring back for this purpose.
If the Jazz trade Lauri, they almost have to use their cap space to take on additional assets by being a place that apron teams can dump salary though. I just wouldn’t want it to be super long-term salary.
 
The idea is a guy who can take offensive pressure off the rookies and be a release valve to help them as they are developing. The fact that he doesn't defend helps the tank.
Sure, I get that, but I want the vets to be workers and guys who play hard. Not that Bogey doesnt work, but his game isnt really the kind of game I want as a vet leader for a bad/young team.
 
Back
Top