What's new

Kamala Harris for Pres

If it makes you feel better, I disagree strongly with Trump in his stance there. I'm open to abortion in cases of rape, incest, dire threats to the physical health of the mother, or fetal defects, but mothers intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

Not just mother's though right? I mean what if the father was involved in the decision to kill off the healthy children?

I know that for you it isn't about the children. It's about controlling women. You always expose yourself whenever you post about abortion.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Not just mother's though right? I mean what if the father was involved in the decision to kill off the healthy children?

I know that for you it isn't about the children. It's about controlling women. You always expose yourself whenever you post about abortion.
I don't put attention there because it is already illegal. If the father of a child takes action to end the life of that child while it is in the womb of the mother, especially when the mother wants to keep the baby, that father will spend a big chunk of his life in prison for the crime of causing the child to lose its life. I'm thinking mothers should be treated the same as fathers. If either of them set about intentionally killing their child, they should go to prison.

My moral stance isn't about controlling anyone, but it is about protecting those who need protection and seeking justice when evildoers take life.
 
I don't put attention there because it is already illegal. If the father of a child takes action to end the life of that child while it is in the womb of the mother, especially when the mother wants to keep the baby, that father will spend a big chunk of his life in prison for the crime of causing the child to lose its life. I'm thinking mothers should be treated the same as fathers. If either of them set about intentionally killing their child, they should go to prison.

My moral stance isn't about controlling anyone, but it is about protecting those who need protection and seeking justice when evildoers take life.
Exactly. You have no problem with a father telling a mother that he thinks they should get an abortion and paying for the abortion etc.
That's all good to you. Thanks for confirming.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Exactly. You have no problem with a father telling a mother that he thinks they should get an abortion and paying for the abortion etc.
Where did you get that idea from? I think abortion of a healthy child should be a crime, and what you described is conspiracy to commit the crime which is every bit as punishable as the crime committed. If anything, in your hypothetical, the father will face the harsher punishment due to being biologically male. .

 
Where did you get that idea from? I think abortion of a healthy child should be a crime, and what you described is conspiracy to commit the crime which is every bit as punishable as the crime committed. If anything, in your hypothetical, the father will face the harsher punishment due to being biologically male. .

Why dont you ever bring up the father's role in abortion then?


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Why dont you ever bring up the father's role in abortion then?
Because it is not about the parents doing the killing. It is about the child being killed. I lend the strength of my voice to the plight of those not powerful enough to speak for themselves. Snuffing those lives out is a horror, and those who support it find it too easy to pretend they don't exist at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Because it is not about the parents doing the killing. It is about the child being killed. I lend the strength of my voice to the plight of those not powerful enough to speak for themselves. Snuffing those lives out is a horror, and those who support it find it too easy to pretend they don't exist at all.
So why always use the noun "women" when you discuss abortion if it's not about the parents. Did you know that the woman is in fact one of the parents?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Of course I hate Trump. He attempted to overthrow a democratic election. Any American citizen who claims to love our country and Constitution should be embarrassed to even consider voting for him after that. But he also gives endless other reasons to hate him and everything he stands for.
 
Both candidates in the race are pro-choice. Trump is also pro-life as in he personally abhors abortion, but he wants the woman's right to choose set at 20 weeks.

“I am very pro-choice. I hate the concept of abortion. ... I just believe in choice. Again, it may be a little bit of a New York background, because there is some different attitude in some different parts of the country. ... I was raised in New York and grew up and worked and everything else in New York City. But I am strongly pro-choice."
-Donald Trump


When Florida was pushing their 6-week abortion ban, Trump was very public about his opinion that 6-weeks was too short and that women should have more weeks.

“There has to be more time . . . I want more weeks.”
-Donald Trump


In the linked video, the women were at 12 weeks and 18 weeks when the fetal defects were discovered. Both would have been able to get abortions if Trump had his way. Trump's position is actually more liberal than most of Europe, but we are where we are because many on the left want no restriction on abortion, including birth being a limit on abortion. Most scoff and say democrats don't want that, but current VP candidate Tim Walz changed the laws of his state to allow it and since becoming governor there have been eight post-birth killings in his state.

Kamala Harris has been asked directly multiple times about any limits she would accept on abortion and she has refused to enumerate any restrictions. So long as there are a contingent pushing for the right of mothers to kill their children even after birth, there are going to be those on the opposite side pushing to outlaw abortion entirely. Trump's position is the compromise position. The Harris / Walz position is what makes compromise impossible. Now we get videos of women who knew about fetal defects earlier than 20 weeks used as fodder to push for allowing mothers to kill perfectly healthy children without restriction.
Presidents don't write laws. I really don't care very much about every single position a Presidential candidate takes on policy or law. I'm pretty sure what your response to this will be, but what I'm concerned about is project 2025 because that is the playbook drafted for the MAGA movement. Trump can claim ignorance all he wants, I don't care if he knew about it or not. He's not a great thinker, so the people who wrote it wouldn't have benefitted from his incoherent input. Nonetheless, they wrote it for him, for his potential administration. It is the MAGA wish list along with operating instructions to get the U.S. there. If Trump gets into office LGBTQ people will be harmed. Women will lose reproductive rights more than they already have. Not by Presidential dictate, but by MAGA legislators passing ****** laws at both the federal and state level.
 
I'm pretty sure what your response to this will be, but what I'm concerned about is...
I'd say that while I disagree some of your points of view, I applaud your thought process at choosing whom to support. I feel that implementing this policy or that policy and the effects of those actions is all perfectly valid for choosing who you want to see in the position of power. I feel too many people get caught up in the personal details that just don't matter to the type of job someone will do if put into the position of responsibility.
 
So why always use the noun "women" when you discuss abortion
I don't. You do.

When talking about this issue, I most commonly refer to mothers killing their child. The term "mother" reinforces that there is a child. The response I get back is about "women" because that linguistically erases the existence of a child. My use "mother" instead of "parent" is due to the statistical reality of who is almost always making the decision to kill the child and my personal view that a mother should be the guardian of ultimate responsibility for the protection of her child.
 
I don't. You do.

When talking about this issue, I most commonly refer to mothers killing their child. The term "mother" reinforces that there is a child. The response I get back is about "women" because that linguistically erases the existence of a child. My use "mother" instead of "parent" is due to the statistical reality of who is almost always making the decision to kill the child and my personal view that a mother should be the guardian of ultimate responsibility for the protection of her child.
Watch this: mothers intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

people intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

parents intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.


You will always go with "mother" or "women" because you don't think of women as equal to men. You see females as less than males and want them to be treated worse.

You have made this obvious through your history of posts on this website.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Watch this: mothers intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

people intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

parents intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.


You will always go with "mother" or "women" because you don't think of women as equal to men. You see females as less than males and want them to be treated worse.

You have made this obvious through your history of posts on this website.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
You nailed it

Is it a coincidence that all of these deplorable misogynistic losers are all “pro life” trumpers?
 
Last edited:
Watch this: mothers intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

people intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.

parents intentionally killing off their healthy children should be made as illegal as intentionally killing anyone else.


You will always go with "mother" or "women" because you don't think of women as equal to men. You see females as less than males and want them to be treated worse.
I'm fine with being considered misogynist so long as we can find agreement on the first three sentences of your post.
 
You nailed it

Is it a coincidence that all of these deplorable misogynistic losers are all “pro life” trumpers?
AI in particular is seeped in the Alpha/manosphere/incel ideology. If you read "Alpha/manosphere/incel" and had no idea what I was talking about, well, you're lucky. And you're damn right I capitalized "Alpha" but none of the rest! Because that's just how masculine I am. Sorry, that's just an attempt at giving the uninitiated a sneak peak into the universe of alpha culture. I mean Salt Lake City was the host of Alpha Con 2022, the first Alpha con, so like the Alpha of Alpha cons.

 
Back
Top