What's new
By:

It has begun...

I keep getting the same thing accept Lamb once. I've been down on Sullinger for the last two years and hate the Millsap comparison they make on there. If they perfected the time machine and could get Sullinger back to 1972 I think he'd be a good asset to have though. Kid just camps in the paint and muscles college kids, wont happen in the NBA, IMO.
 
I got Bradley Beal once and once I got the GSW winning the 2nd pick and Utah was SOL.
 
I did it 12 straight times and every time the pick was either #9 or #10. Every time it selected Meyers Leonard except once it was Cody Zeller.
 
Omfg look at that guy's unibrow. He's the top prospect? LOL. Look at that thing!!! aklsdhuilwdhjasndwladnsakjldnwkmas

Also, no lottery PGs this year? Maybe we do want to our draft pick to be deferred a year.
 
?? I haven't been following this but I thought this year's class was supposed to be one of the best since many players passed on last year's draft??? I don't really see it - the field looks pretty average from #7 onwards.

Looking at this - I'm pretty happy with Kanter as our #3 pick last year. I think he has as much upside/potential as anyone with the exception of Davis, Barnes and MKG.
 
Lance-A-Million said:
Omfg look at that guy's unibrow. He's the top prospect? LOL. Look at that thing!!! aklsdhuilwdhjasndwladnsakjldnwkmas

Also, no lottery PGs this year? Maybe we do want to our draft pick to be deferred a year.
Click to expand...

Davis in 100% incredible.

No, there are no lottery worthy PG's in 2012. There are also none in 2013 .. barring someone emerging in a big way. I've been posting that warning for 2 years now.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
?? I haven't been following this but I thought this year's class was supposed to be one of the best since many players passed on last year's draft??? I don't really see it - the field looks pretty average from #7 onwards.

Looking at this - I'm pretty happy with Kanter as our #3 pick last year. I think he has as much upside/potential as anyone with the exception of Davis, Barnes and MKG.
Click to expand...

The draft is stacked out to 20, easily. Definitely have to consider Andre Drummond as a top potential guy as well .. even though I think he's been disappointing this year (10/8).
 
If we get a top 10 pick I'd like to move it for a team with multiple PG's that are looking to get a big man.
 
bat said:
If we get a top 10 pick I'd like to move it for a team with multiple PG's that are looking to get a big man.
Click to expand...

This draft is more stacked with SF's than big men. I would have to get a very good PG in exchange for a top 10 pick .. as we could get a stud SF.
 
Let's be honest the Jazz desperately want to draft a SF (PG would be ideal, but apparently God decided not to make any in 1993). This draft is loaded with PFs, the last position the Jazz would draft, and if things pan out like Mr. Ford has on this website then I definitely see the Jazz trading their pick. If they get their own lottery pick I could see them packaging both picks (say 9 & 13) to move up to grab either Barnes, MKG (possibly even P. Jones - I could see him playing SF) or if they just get GS's pick I could see them trading back to either pick up Q. Miller (just outside the lottery - according to Mr. Ford here) or a PG.

If the Jazz do get a pick in the lottery I would have to think that they will do whatever necessary to walk away with any of those 4. - My order would be:

1. Barnes (if we didn't lack an outside threat so much I'd go with my #2)
2. MKG - would instantly become a fan favorite - think a 6'7" Earl Watson on steroids
3. Q. Miller - Long, athletic, can shoot
4. P. Jones - lukewarm, but I'd want him over the 10 other PFs in the lottery as I could really see him playing the 3 - even though that wouldn't be his idle position.
 
margodydek said:
Let's be honest the Jazz desperately want to draft a SF (PG would be ideal, but apparently God decided not to make any in 1993). This draft is loaded with PFs, the last position the Jazz would draft, and if things pan out like Mr. Ford has on this website then I definitely see the Jazz trading their pick. If they get their own lottery pick I could see them packaging both picks (say 9 & 13) to move up to grab either Barnes, MKG (possibly even P. Jones - I could see him playing SF) or if they just get GS's pick I could see them trading back to either pick up Q. Miller (just outside the lottery - according to Mr. Ford here) or a PG.

If the Jazz do get a pick in the lottery I would have to think that they will do whatever necessary to walk away with any of those 4. - My order would be:

1. Barnes (if we didn't lack an outside threat so much I'd go with my #2)
2. MKG - would instantly become a fan favorite - think a 6'7" Earl Watson on steroids3. Q. Miller - Long, athletic, can shoot
4. P. Jones - lukewarm, but I'd want him over the 10 other PFs in the lottery as I could really see him playing the 3 - even though that wouldn't be his idle position.
Click to expand...

Everything I have seen or read about this guys character (has not been alot of material) has pointed to him being the kind of guy the Jazz want. Hard working, good kid. Maybe we can get lucky and land him and work on getting some shooters thru a trade.
 
margodydek said:
Let's be honest the Jazz desperately want to draft a SF (PG would be ideal, but apparently God decided not to make any in 1993). This draft is loaded with PFs, the last position the Jazz would draft, and if things pan out like Mr. Ford has on this website then I definitely see the Jazz trading their pick. If they get their own lottery pick I could see them packaging both picks (say 9 & 13) to move up to grab either Barnes, MKG (possibly even P. Jones - I could see him playing SF) or if they just get GS's pick I could see them trading back to either pick up Q. Miller (just outside the lottery - according to Mr. Ford here) or a PG.

If the Jazz do get a pick in the lottery I would have to think that they will do whatever necessary to walk away with any of those 4. - My order would be:

1. Barnes (if we didn't lack an outside threat so much I'd go with my #2)
2. MKG - would instantly become a fan favorite - think a 6'7" Earl Watson on steroids
3. Q. Miller - Long, athletic, can shoot
4. P. Jones - lukewarm, but I'd want him over the 10 other PFs in the lottery as I could really see him playing the 3 - even though that wouldn't be his idle position.
Click to expand...

That's funny because I've always questioned PJones' effort/intensity.

Both of the Jones' are tweeners and I don't think either can play the SF position except the occassional favorable matchup.
Mine are (in order) Barnes, Miller, MKG. I love MKG, I just can't deny the upside of Miller and the shooting of Barnes.
Like you said, if we had great shooters already, I'd take MKG for his lockdown defense, stat stuffing, and intangibles.
 
PKM said:
The draft is stacked out to 20, easily. Definitely have to consider Andre Drummond as a top potential guy as well .. even though I think he's been disappointing this year (10/8).
Click to expand...

Our own pick could very well be #20+, may be we could take a punt on Marshall/Kobongo, etc? They could turn into a Ty Lawson/Buboise perhaps?
 
Gojazz79 said:
I got the GSW pick as a #9 and the picked Jared Sullinger a PF. If that happens I would be stunned if there is not trade where a big gets moved out. (We'd have Big Al, Millsap, Favors, Kanter, Sullinger and Evans)
Click to expand...
Holy ****. Nightmarishly stupid scenario.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top