What's new

Following potential 2012 draftees

I watch those sites. But UK is hearing 6 teams are currently taking someone else .. putting MKG at 7 or worse. From conversations I've had, though not a decision-maker, I think he's 6-8. I think he goes back. He wants to go back. I sense he hopes things point to going back. Don't underestimate his hard life, losses of father figures, and love for Calipari.

I see. Do you know who those teams are taking over him? Cause like I said, there's only four prospects I really see as being drafted ahead of him. Jones is soft; Sullinger lacks size AND athleticism; Lamb has lost his momentum; Beal's shot hasn't been dropping as expected...I'm just not seeing how there's more than 4 better choices than him.
 
I see. Do you know who those teams are taking over him? Cause like I said, there's only four prospects I really see as being drafted ahead of him. Jones is soft; Sullinger lacks size AND athleticism; Lamb has lost his momentum; Beal's shot hasn't been dropping as expected...I'm just not seeing how there's more than 4 better choices than him.

It comes down to his broken shot. Do you really want to take a player who may never have a hope to be a consistently hit a 15'-23' shot in the top 5? I can see taking a guy like that 7-10, but top 5 seems high to me.

If he stays an extra year or 2 in college he will at worst prove he is a ****ty shooter and get drafted in the late lottery like Ronnie Brewer did. At best he makes dramatic improvements in his jumper and moves into the top 5.
 
I see. Do you know who those teams are taking over him? Cause like I said, there's only four prospects I really see as being drafted ahead of him. Jones is soft; Sullinger lacks size AND athleticism; Lamb has lost his momentum; Beal's shot hasn't been dropping as expected...I'm just not seeing how there's more than 4 better choices than him.

generally ...

davis, drummond, barnes, robinson, sullinger
 
It comes down to his broken shot. Do you really want to take a player who may never have a hope to be a consistently hit a 15'-23' shot in the top 5? I can see taking a guy like that 7-10, but top 5 seems high to me.

Fair enough, I suppose. Who would YOU have in your top 5, then? Just curious.
 
It comes down to his broken shot. Do you really want to take a player who may never have a hope to be a consistently hit a 15'-23' shot in the top 5? I can see taking a guy like that 7-10, but top 5 seems high to me.

If he stays an extra year or 2 in college he will at worst prove he is a ****ty shooter and get drafted in the late lottery like Ronnie Brewer did. At best he makes dramatic improvements in his jumper and moves into the top 5.

We agree he has a broken shot. Your constant comparison to RBrewer, though, is embarrassing for you.
 
We agree he has a broken shot. Your constant comparison to RBrewer, though, is embarrassing for you.

He is very similar to Brewer. MKG's only difference is that he has 4 man ability in small ball lineups, which would give him a huge advantage if the team that drafts him uses him that way.

If they draft MKG to be a traditional 3, he may end up having a Ronnie Brewer career.
 
Damn good list. *shocked*

I may make NO change. You are damn smart!

I guess I could see how MKG could slip into the 5th spot, because I think the top 4 is clearly Davis, Robinson, Barnes, Drummond. The 5th best player is kind of a crap shoot.
 
Back
Top