chawx
Active Member
Recently, HoopIdea has been trying to address how to fix two major issues in the NBA. One is flopping, offensive and defensive, and the other is tanking to gain lottery picks/better draft order. I know we all hate flopping, but I'll leave that discussion alone for now, what I want to talk to you guys about is tanking.
Now, a vocal few of you have stayed strong in your view point that the Jazz should lose more games to keep/get a better draft pick. This group, since the start of the season, has wanted (even hoped) for the Jazz to lose games to improve their chances at getting the "next superstar" in this upcoming draft. Even now, while this team is surging and the youngs and vets are starting to get a feel for each other and playing inspired basketball, they still can't enjoy a victory because their mind is so set on, "If we just tank this year, or tank the next couple years, we'll get that Durant-like guy that will lead us to a championship".
Well, I've been reading a few of these articles by HoopIdea and wanted to pass them along to see how you guys all felt about it.
First off, about the "OKC model" or "Supersonic model" however you want to call it: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39546/the-oklahoma-city-unicorns
Second: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39318/tanking-is-the-tip-of-the-iceberg
Finally, a fix, offered by ex-coach (and coach that some have mentioned for here in Utah) Jeff Van Gundy: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39583/fix-tanking-jeff-van-gundy
I know this a HUGE opening to a thread, but if you're in the TL;DR club...here you go:
What it boils down to is this: Should the NBA fix the current problem of fan bases, teams, and GMs openly hoping to suck, just for the chance at getting a top 5 or top 10 pick in the draft?
Now, a vocal few of you have stayed strong in your view point that the Jazz should lose more games to keep/get a better draft pick. This group, since the start of the season, has wanted (even hoped) for the Jazz to lose games to improve their chances at getting the "next superstar" in this upcoming draft. Even now, while this team is surging and the youngs and vets are starting to get a feel for each other and playing inspired basketball, they still can't enjoy a victory because their mind is so set on, "If we just tank this year, or tank the next couple years, we'll get that Durant-like guy that will lead us to a championship".
Well, I've been reading a few of these articles by HoopIdea and wanted to pass them along to see how you guys all felt about it.
First off, about the "OKC model" or "Supersonic model" however you want to call it: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39546/the-oklahoma-city-unicorns
<- There are some great points here about how this tactic is an extremely rare case study and not something every team should/could aspire to complete....What I’m suggesting is that the current lottery system does not help struggling teams nearly as much as one might think. It’s a collection of life preservers thrown a struggling group of franchises, but only one in four actually float. Thrashing about in the deep blue sea of futility to get that kind of odds of finding a great player hardly seems worth it.
Second: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39318/tanking-is-the-tip-of-the-iceberg
<- This is an overall assessment of tanking in general and paints a pretty bleak picture for those teams trying to employ this tactic.Without the prospect of high picks, however, surely owners around the league would replace incompetent GMs with executives who knew about building culture, developing players, identifying talent, negotiating good value from contracts and trades and the like. Expecting any team to contend without that kind of management is asking too much of luck. Winning in the NBA is like winning in anything. A well executed long-term strategy creates the most predictable success, even in a game with trump cards. If you're a fan of a team that makes several bad decisions a year, you probably can't luck into players good enough to overcome the the missteps of a chronically underperforming front office.
Finally, a fix, offered by ex-coach (and coach that some have mentioned for here in Utah) Jeff Van Gundy: https://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/39583/fix-tanking-jeff-van-gundy
<- I like his thoughts on this and personally would like to see this strategy employed in the NBA. Imagine if those Stockton and Malone teams got a top 5 pick just once or twice when all they did was win. History would have played out much differently.A few weeks ago, Jeff Van Gundy addressed tanking on TrueHoop TV, and as usual he didn't mince words, saying: "The whole idea of getting bad, as bad as you can, to get good, basically throwing away seasons, throwing games, not trying your best to win ... should have no place in the draft."
I know this a HUGE opening to a thread, but if you're in the TL;DR club...here you go:
What it boils down to is this: Should the NBA fix the current problem of fan bases, teams, and GMs openly hoping to suck, just for the chance at getting a top 5 or top 10 pick in the draft?