What's new

OKC or San Antonio?

"I'm your density," what's should be ours?

  • OKC

    Votes: 37 44.6%
  • San Antonio

    Votes: 22 26.5%
  • Please, let us get our picks!

    Votes: 24 28.9%

  • Total voters
    83
Then pop up the championship rosters and see that nearly every team had a top pick leading them. MJ, Shaq, and Duncan account for most the titles in the last 20 years. Teams don't build through the draft because these three guys ate every other team's draft pick for lunch.

The counter to this is the top notch players would leave Utah. Well, they aren't signing here either so I guess we're perpetually ****ed by the no draft argument.

I actually agree with this argument. Since there are so few players like MJ, Shaq, and Duncan in the draft, you can't afford to dictate your decisions about team development and tanking vs. not tanking on the outside chance that you're going to get someone like that. Teams bad enough to compete for those players are in turmoil. The success stories are so few and far between, it's amazing that people would use them as a reason to lose.

The Jazz are doing fine. They have a roster stacked with lottery picks despite the fact that they've only had two losing seasons since the early 80's. Once we get all four of these guys running on all cylinders every game and add a few supporting players, they will be a great team.
 
The problem is these are the exact same arguments being offered up after 20 games when the Jazz had a chance to move either Big Al or Harris and take a shot at not only the #5, but putting one more cushion underneath a GSW tank. Just because it's now a 13-14 pick instead of a top 5 doesn't change the essence of the argument. It makes it easier to take that playoff side but it does not alter the fact that this team is not good enough to contend in 3-4 years and the Jazz are not going to draw a superstar to get it done.



Then pop up the championship rosters and see that nearly every team had a top pick leading them. MJ, Shaq, and Duncan account for most the titles in the last 20 years. Teams don't build through the draft because these three guys ate every other team's draft pick for lunch.

The counter to this is the top notch players would leave Utah. Well, they aren't signing here either so I guess we're perpetually ****ed by the no draft argument.

If your argument requires you to go back in time to be valid, then I'd say it's OK if you change your stance. I have.
 
Jazz are 11-22 on the road this year, worst team in the playoff picture.

I chose OKC. I dont know exactly why because we cant stop KD or Westbrook, but I guess just because SAS just have our number in SA consistently over the past decade.
 
we just need experience. It does sound like I have a lot more faith in these guys than you do. I think we have some excellent talent and definitely enough for a championship. We just need to let them reach that championship form ... starting with this year's playoffs.

I disagree. Boy do I disagree. I think with more experience we will be a good team, but I don't see us winning any titles. Sorry.

Does everyone on the playoff side of this also think we have enough young talent to one day win a title? If this is the case, that would explain why no one is even attempting to answer my question of how we are supposed to build a contender if not through the draft.
 
I actually agree with this argument. Since there are so few players like MJ, Shaq, and Duncan in the draft, you can't afford to dictate your decisions about team development and tanking vs. not tanking on the outside chance that you're going to get someone like that. Teams bad enough to compete for those players are in turmoil. The success stories are so few and far between, it's amazing that people would use them as a reason to lose.

The Jazz are doing fine. They have a roster stacked with lottery picks despite the fact that they've only had two losing seasons since the early 80's. Once we get all four of these guys running on all cylinders every game and add a few supporting players, they will be a great team.

OK, this has all been covered before but I'll be patient.

1. We're not talking about a Charlotte-esque foundation. Nothing close. This is a verge playoff team after all.

2. We're not talking about acquiring the next future MVP and first ballot HOFer. We're talking about adding another piece or two high draft picks that can be traded/packaged for a missing link.

3. If you need one of these players but "can't afford to dictate your decisions about team development and tanking vs. not tanking on the outside chance that you're going to get someone like that" then you're accepting mediocrity by default.

4. The Four are nowhere near as promising as the Detroit (or even Dallas) team you're trying to duplicate. Favors has to become Sheed, Kanter a Wallace, Burks a Rip Hamilton, Gordon Hayward a Prince, and you still don't have a crunch time stud point guard. Think about what you're expecting these guys to develop into and then compare that to what they've shown thus far.
 
Just because the NBA has a 16 team playoff format, doesn't mean all those teams belong in the post season. No doubt, if Stern decided to expand the playoffs to 22 teams, some dumbass Bobcats fan would be preaching the same cardboard cutout arguments being made on this board about how the playoff fairy sprinkles her magic dust on their team, and therefore turns them into something they're not. A good team.

I think you should change your user name to that for our magical playoff run.
 
God, when did our fans become some whiny *******? You all need to man the **** up and stop cowering in the corner pissing yourself like a three-year old terrified of what's under his bed.
Reppped. I can't believe the drivel I'm reading on this site lately. The idea that missing the playoffs would be a good thing is absolutely idiotic yet it's become rampant around here.
 
4. The Four are nowhere near as promising as the Detroit (or even Dallas) team you're trying to duplicate. Favors has to become Sheed, Kanter a Wallace, Burks a Rip Hamilton, Gordon Hayward a Prince, and you still don't have a crunch time stud point guard. Think about what you're expecting these guys to develop into and then compare that to what they've shown thus far.

Hi all. Lemme jump in here for a tidbit.


1) Favors has to become Sheed. Oh, so Favors has to be a career 14.6/6.7 player, and has to peak at 19.3/8.2 in his seventh season in the NBA. Favors already is AT LEAST as good defensively, Rebounds at a similar clip, and could easily score that much given the minutes. Favors is easily more promising.
2) Gordon Hayward has to become Tayshaun Prince. A career 12.9/4.7/2.7 player, while averaging 36.8% from three, and 46.4% FG. In his second season in the NBA, he is averaging 12 ppg, 3apg, and 3rpg. Tayshaun peaked at 15/5/3. For Hayward, that stat line seems very obtainable.
3) Burks has to become Rip Hamilton. This is probably the only unlikely scenario. Rip has career stats of 17.7/3.5apg/3/3rpg. He peaked at 20.1ppg, 4.9apg, and 3.9rpg. He also shot 45.8% from three in an 80 game season, as well as shooting nearly 50% from the field. Burks is a much different player than Rip. He has the potential to be as good as him, but in a different way (along the Dwayne Wade, Brandon Roy mould). Is this the go to scorer that we can take in this draft? At a 13th-14th pick? Doubtful.
4) Kanter has to become Ben Wallace. Kanter will never be a 4-time defensive MVP. Will he be a good defensive center? From what I have seen, absolutely. His post-defense is a work in progress, but he is phenomenal in the pick and roll.


Bench: We have sap, they had Memo. Obviously they had other great bench players, but this is something that isn't as much of a worry at this point in time.

EDIT, For Cyrone: This team currently has no Billups. And by that, I don't mean that we don't have an above-average point guard. Because really, Chauncey is not an AMAZING distributor, lights-out shooter, or a surefire sharpshooter. What he can do, most-improtantly, is a) get at the line, and hit FTs at an amazing clip b) hit big shots, and make clutch-time plays. Getting a decent point guard for this team won't be very difficult. Getting a clutch player for us, will. I can't see Millsap being nearly as effective in late game situations, in comparison to Billups. So, our only hope, is that either a) Burks or Hayward pan out to become big-time players, or b) trade Al for a pick that becomes one.

So, are the Four NOWHERE near as promising as Detroit's 4? Not really. Favors has a much higher ceiling than Rasheed, Hayward will be at least as good as Tayshaun, probably better as well. Will Kanter be as good (defensively) as Wallace? Nope. Will he be able to hold his own at the 5? Yep. Is he a liability offensively? Nope. I say its a draw. Burks and Rip are different players, but Ill hand it to you in regards to Rip being much more promising in his rookie season than Burks has been, even though he was 21 when he was drafted.

Our core four definitely have more potential than you seem to think. If we can somehow land an 8th pick in this upcoming draft from Golden State, trade Al to the Bucks/Rockets/whoever if we make it to the playoffs, we now have a core four, a decent point guard, potentially Kendall Marshall/Barnes as an 8th pick, Millsap, and decent bench pieces. Do we NEED to miss the playoffs this year? Absolutely not. Should we trade Al? Absolutely. Keep in mind, us making the playoffs makes Al MUCH more tradable, especially during draft time. If George Hill merited a pick like Kawhi Leonard, Al Jefferson should be able to land us a lottery pick.


Our only need currently, is for a clutch-player in late game situations. I am of the opinion that Hayward can fulfil that role.


So, should we make the playoffs? Personally, I don't think we really have a choice. What is more beneficial? Well, in the instance that we are shopping Al, I would assume that his trade value will shoot up, especially when other GMs look at his PER, ppg, rpg, apt, and improved passing- all while shedding the sigma of "never being able to take a team to the playoffs". On the other hand, if we miss, we could get the 14th pick AND trade for Al. Who knows what could get the bigger haul.

Personally, I like cheering for this team, as you all do. I hate having my team missing the playoffs, but I would also hate my team never having a chance for contention. Getting the 14th pick and missing the playoffs honestly seems like the more logical decision; however, you guys are making it as if this team will absolutely bust if we miss the playoffs. Uhh, not true. We have a PLETHORA of good trading chips, a serious amount of cap room coming up, and four seriously promising players. Personally, Im undecided regarding what is more beneficial, but all I know is that I have been rooting for this team to win every game this season, and that will not change at any point in time.


Oh, and PS: I'd chose San Antonio over OKC

Take care everyone. Hopefully we can win the next three. Playoff PUSH!!!!
 
Hi all. Lemme jump in here for a tidbit.


1) Favors has to become Sheed. Oh, so Favors has to be a career 14.6/6.7 player, and has to peak at 19.3/8.2 in his seventh season in the NBA. Favors already is AT LEAST as good defensively, Rebounds at a similar clip, and could easily score that much given the minutes. Favors is easily more promising.
2) Gordon Hayward has to become Tayshaun Prince. A career 12.9/4.7/2.7 player, while averaging 36.8% from three, and 46.4% FG. In his second season in the NBA, he is averaging 12 ppg, 3apg, and 3rpg. Tayshaun peaked at 15/5/3. For Hayward, that stat line seems very obtainable.
3) Burks has to become Rip Hamilton. This is probably the only unlikely scenario. Rip has career stats of 17.7/3.5apg/3/3rpg. He peaked at 20.1ppg, 4.9apg, and 3.9rpg. He also shot 45.8% from three in an 80 game season, as well as shooting nearly 50% from the field. Burks is a much different player than Rip. He has the potential to be as good as him, but in a different way (along the Dwayne Wade, Brandon Roy mould). Is this the go to scorer that we can take in this draft? At a 13th-14th pick? Doubtful.
4) Kanter has to become Ben Wallace. Kanter will never be a 4-time defensive MVP. Will he be a good defensive center? From what I have seen, absolutely. His post-defense is a work in progress, but he is phenomenal in the pick and roll.


Bench: We have sap, they had Memo. Obviously they had other great bench players, but this is something that isn't as much of a worry at this point in time.


So, are the Four NOWHERE near as promising as Detroit's 4? Not really. Favors has a much higher ceiling than Rasheed, Hayward will be at least as good as Tayshaun, probably better as well. Will Kanter be as good (defensively) as Wallace? Nope. Will he be able to hold his own at the 5? Yep. Is he a liability offensively? Nope. I say its a draw. Burks and Rip are different players, but Ill hand it to you in regards to Rip being much more promising in his rookie season than Burks has been, even though he was 21 when he was drafted.

Our core four definitely have more potential than you seem to think. If we can somehow land an 8th pick in this upcoming draft from Golden State, trade Al to the Bucks/Rockets/whoever if we make it to the playoffs, we now have a core four, a decent point guard, potentially Kendall Marshall/Barnes as an 8th pick, Millsap, and decent bench pieces. Do we NEED to miss the playoffs this year? Absolutely not. Should we trade Al? Absolutely. Keep in mind, us making the playoffs makes Al MUCH more tradable, especially during draft time. If George Hill merited a pick like Kawhi Leonard, Al Jefferson should be able to land us a lottery pick.



So, should we make the playoffs? Personally, I don't think we really have a choice. What is more beneficial? Well, in the instance that we are shopping Al, I would assume that his trade value will shoot up, especially when other GMs look at his PER, ppg, rpg, apt, and improved passing- all while shedding the sigma of "never being able to take a team to the playoffs". On the other hand, if we miss, we could get the 14th pick AND trade for Al. Who knows what could get the bigger haul.

Personally, I like cheering for this team, as you all do. I hate having my team missing the playoffs, but I would also hate my team never having a chance for contention. Getting the 14th pick and missing the playoffs honestly seems like the more logical decision; however, you guys are making it as if this team will absolutely bust if we miss the playoffs. Uhh, not true. We have a PLETHORA of good trading chips, a serious amount of cap room coming up, and four seriously promising players. Personally, Im undecided regarding what is more beneficial, but all I know is that I have been rooting for this team to win every game this season, and that will not change at any point in time.


Oh, and PS: I'd chose San Antonio over OKC

Take care everyone. Hopefully we can win the next three. Playoff PUSH!!!!

You forgot Billups.
 
Also, by not getting the pick this year, we get the monkey off our backs of owing Minnesota a pick, which is great for trade reasons.
 
Reppped. I can't believe the drivel I'm reading on this site lately. The idea that missing the playoffs would be a good thing is absolutely idiotic yet it's become rampant around here.

I'm guessing you couldn't set the pieces up on a chess board. Strategy? What the **** is that right amIright?
 
Hi all. Lemme jump in here for a tidbit.


1) Favors has to become Sheed. Oh, so Favors has to be a career 14.6/6.7 player, and has to peak at 19.3/8.2 in his seventh season in the NBA. Favors already is AT LEAST as good defensively, Rebounds at a similar clip, and could easily score that much given the minutes. Favors is easily more promising.
2) Gordon Hayward has to become Tayshaun Prince. A career 12.9/4.7/2.7 player, while averaging 36.8% from three, and 46.4% FG. In his second season in the NBA, he is averaging 12 ppg, 3apg, and 3rpg. Tayshaun peaked at 15/5/3. For Hayward, that stat line seems very obtainable.
3) Burks has to become Rip Hamilton. This is probably the only unlikely scenario. Rip has career stats of 17.7/3.5apg/3/3rpg. He peaked at 20.1ppg, 4.9apg, and 3.9rpg. He also shot 45.8% from three in an 80 game season, as well as shooting nearly 50% from the field. Burks is a much different player than Rip. He has the potential to be as good as him, but in a different way (along the Dwayne Wade, Brandon Roy mould). Is this the go to scorer that we can take in this draft? At a 13th-14th pick? Doubtful.
4) Kanter has to become Ben Wallace. Kanter will never be a 4-time defensive MVP. Will he be a good defensive center? From what I have seen, absolutely. His post-defense is a work in progress, but he is phenomenal in the pick and roll.


Bench: We have sap, they had Memo. Obviously they had other great bench players, but this is something that isn't as much of a worry at this point in time.

EDIT, For Cyrone: This team currently has no Billups. And by that, I don't mean that we don't have an above-average point guard. Because really, Chauncey is not an AMAZING distributor, lights-out shooter, or a surefire sharpshooter. What he can do, most-improtantly, is a) get at the line, and hit FTs at an amazing clip b) hit big shots, and make clutch-time plays. Getting a decent point guard for this team won't be very difficult. Getting a clutch player for us, will. I can't see Millsap being nearly as effective in late game situations, in comparison to Billups. So, our only hope, is that either a) Burks or Hayward pan out to become big-time players, or b) trade Al for a pick that becomes one.

So, are the Four NOWHERE near as promising as Detroit's 4? Not really. Favors has a much higher ceiling than Rasheed, Hayward will be at least as good as Tayshaun, probably better as well. Will Kanter be as good (defensively) as Wallace? Nope. Will he be able to hold his own at the 5? Yep. Is he a liability offensively? Nope. I say its a draw. Burks and Rip are different players, but Ill hand it to you in regards to Rip being much more promising in his rookie season than Burks has been, even though he was 21 when he was drafted.

Our core four definitely have more potential than you seem to think. If we can somehow land an 8th pick in this upcoming draft from Golden State, trade Al to the Bucks/Rockets/whoever if we make it to the playoffs, we now have a core four, a decent point guard, potentially Kendall Marshall/Barnes as an 8th pick, Millsap, and decent bench pieces. Do we NEED to miss the playoffs this year? Absolutely not. Should we trade Al? Absolutely. Keep in mind, us making the playoffs makes Al MUCH more tradable, especially during draft time. If George Hill merited a pick like Kawhi Leonard, Al Jefferson should be able to land us a lottery pick.


Our only need currently, is for a clutch-player in late game situations. I am of the opinion that Hayward can fulfil that role.


So, should we make the playoffs? Personally, I don't think we really have a choice. What is more beneficial? Well, in the instance that we are shopping Al, I would assume that his trade value will shoot up, especially when other GMs look at his PER, ppg, rpg, apt, and improved passing- all while shedding the sigma of "never being able to take a team to the playoffs". On the other hand, if we miss, we could get the 14th pick AND trade for Al. Who knows what could get the bigger haul.

Personally, I like cheering for this team, as you all do. I hate having my team missing the playoffs, but I would also hate my team never having a chance for contention. Getting the 14th pick and missing the playoffs honestly seems like the more logical decision; however, you guys are making it as if this team will absolutely bust if we miss the playoffs. Uhh, not true. We have a PLETHORA of good trading chips, a serious amount of cap room coming up, and four seriously promising players. Personally, Im undecided regarding what is more beneficial, but all I know is that I have been rooting for this team to win every game this season, and that will not change at any point in time.


Oh, and PS: I'd chose San Antonio over OKC

Take care everyone. Hopefully we can win the next three. Playoff PUSH!!!!

Please let me know if you just tried to compare The Four to The Detroit Five who were so ****ty they only won one championship. Then I'll feel comfortable skipping over it again while going straight to LMFAOLOLOLOROFLOLOL. TIA TEQUILA.
 
I'm just along for the ride, but the current playoff/no playoff situation reminds me a lot of the banter surrounding the Deron trade. There were those who were upset that our immediate winning potential had decreased, and those who accepted this reality but posited that the long-term benefit was worth the sacrifice. Except it seemed much more lopsided at the time -- not nearly the deluge of "you play to win no matter what!" arguments that I'm seeing in this thread. The prevailing attitude more closely resembled that of an investor: "you gotta spend money to make money".

I think the Jazz will be better off long-term if they miss out on the playoffs this year. And I'm relatively young, so I'm all about increasing the odds of seeing a championship before I die, even if it means missing out on four playoff games next month. YB, on the other hand....I can understand where he's coming from. I'm secretly hoping that the Jazz make the playoffs, however (don't tell bordelais7), so that I can continue to observe -- and participate in -- the spectacle known as Jazzfanz. Thank you all in advance.
 
I'm just along for the ride, but the current playoff/no playoff situation reminds me a lot of the banter surrounding the Deron trade. There were those who were upset that our immediate winning potential had decreased, and those who accepted this reality but posited that the long-term benefit was worth the sacrifice. Except it seemed much more lopsided at the time -- not nearly the deluge of "you play to win no matter what!" arguments that I'm seeing in this thread. The prevailing attitude more closely resembled that of an investor: "you gotta spend money to make money".

I think the Jazz will be better off long-term if they miss out on the playoffs this year. And I'm relatively young, so I'm all about increasing the odds of seeing a championship before I die, even if it means missing out on four playoff games next month. YB, on the other hand....I can understand where he's coming from. I'm secretly hoping that the Jazz make the playoffs, however (don't tell bordelais7), so that I can continue to observe -- and participate in -- the spectacle known as Jazzfanz. Thank you all in advance.

Hmm. Seems like a different situation because KOC had obviously seen something in Dwill that he thought was special. If KOC thinks there is anyone in this draft that he has to have, he should be able to get them (outside of Davis).
 
Should have specified which Deron trade. I was referring to the one which sent him away from Utah.

OH, in that case, I think the trade was done because KOC wanted to avoid the media circus that would come with his contract year.
 
No doubt, if Stern decided to expand the playoffs to 22 teams, some dumbass Bobcats fan would be preaching the same cardboard cutout arguments being made on this board about how the playoff fairy sprinkles her magic dust on their team, and therefore turns them into something they're not. A good team.

Well, if the playoff fairy doesn't work, hopefully we'll get the draft fairy to turn our mid-round pick into a superstar. :)
 
Back
Top