What's new

We have to have Harden

Why are the Thunder signing Williams in these scenarios? They don't need a guy like D-Will, they just need to improve their interior players.
 
I think Ibaka will be around 10 million (is that near max?), that seems to be the going price for athletically dominant defensive big men who are a lost cause on offense.

Ibaka was First Team All-Defense and quite frankly should have won DPOY.

He'll be looking for Tyson Chandler money for sure - and that's more like 13-15 mil.
 
To me this is the same thing as all those people yesterday saying you have to throw this and that many quarters in the air and if so and so quarters land on heads, than the Jazz will get the 8th pick. When in reality, 27% is 27% and its all relative.

What I'm trying to say is you can argue semantics all day long but when it comes right down to it, two teams are gonna walk out on that court and when it comes game time, if I'm the Thunder, I want the best 5 guys on my squad. Period.

Well then why not go get Bron, Paul, and a couple others to add to the 5 studs they've already got? Now THAT **** there would sell some Zima!!
 
Ibaka was First Team All-Defense and quite frankly should have won DPOY.

He'll be looking for Tyson Chandler money for sure - and that's more like 13-15 mil.

Why does he get so little minutes then?

27 mpg throughout the regular season. I can understand that because of the lockout and resting players.

27 mpg throughout the playoffs. I don't understand that if he is truly a DPOY.
 
Why does he get so little minutes then?

27 mpg throughout the regular season. I can understand that because of the lockout and resting players.

27 mpg throughout the playoffs. I don't understand that if he is truly a DPOY.

I thought this would be obvious .. OKC is dumbing down his minutes/stats to keep him as much under the radar as possible, so they can re-sign him for 10.
 
I thought this would be obvious .. OKC is dumbing down his minutes/stats to keep him as much under the radar as possible, so they can re-sign him for 10.

Ibaka also a lower rebound rate than Jefferson, so he is a below below average rebounder according to the board.
 
Ibaka also a lower rebound rate than Jefferson, so he is a below below average rebounder according to the board.

I gotta admit, I tend to shut down (and completely ignore any and all stats) when I see these two words in the same sentence. I have a bias that has formed from watching him and I cannot change that paradigm at this point.

/olddog
 
Last edited:
Well then why not go get Bron, Paul, and a couple others to add to the 5 studs they've already got? Now THAT **** there would sell some Zima!!

Well, in a fantasy world that would be great, but Lebrons contract is not up for awhile https://hoopshype.com/salaries/miami.htm and outside of the Thunder trading every draft pick they have, plus a couple of their young guys (Aldrich, Maynor etc.) there probably isnt any way they are getting James.

If Paul opts out I could see them putting the full court press on getting him. I'm a bigger fan of DWill, but how can you not want to go after a guy like Chris Paul when you see some of those things that he does out there on the court?
 
I'm not sure OKC will resign Harden over Ibaka. Looking at last night, it seems like Harden and Westbrook are taking away looks from KD. Harden is looking for his shot much more than he did in the regular season. He is definitely trying to prove himself but having 3 superstars at the 1, 2, and 3 won't win you a championship because each player needs the ball in his hands. OKC may want to consider moving Westbrook to the 2 and signing a young PG once Harden's contract is up.
 
Why does he get so little minutes then?

27 mpg throughout the regular season. I can understand that because of the lockout and resting players.

27 mpg throughout the playoffs. I don't understand that if he is truly a DPOY.


You were the one who described him as an athletically dominant big man.

Besides, he only plays 2 less minutes a game than Harden and he's already been annointed a max deal

The going rate for top shelf defenders (who also happens to be the best shot blocker) in this league is more than 10 mil - case in point Tyson Chandler.

Throw all the stats you want at me - you can bet someone will give him Chandler money.
 
You were the one who described him as an athletically dominant big man.

The going rate for top shelf defenders (who also happens to be the best shot blocker) in this league is more than 10 mil - case in point Tyson Chandler.

Throw all the stats you want at me - you can bet someone will give him Chandler money.

Nah, that was a serious question. Why isn't he getting more minutes?
 
Nah, that was a serious question. Why isn't he getting more minutes?

Why doesn't Harden get more minutes? Go ask Scott Broooks - how the **** should I know.

BTW

Chandler in Dallas 2011 = 27MPG
Ibaka in OKC 2012 = 27MPG

Chandler's deal tops out at just under 15mil.
 
Why doesn't Harden get more minutes? Go ask Scott Broooks - how the **** should I know.

BTW

Chandler in Dallas 2011 = 27MPG
Ibaka in OKC 2012 = 27MPG

Chandler's deal tops out at just under 15mil.

He got 33 mpg in the playoffs.......
 
It doesn't matter how many minutes Ibaka hasn't played. The fact that he's so productive in so few minutes is actually a positive in regards to how he'd be viewed. He's going to make a ****load of money, and I fail to see why it would be for anything less than Chandler (besides that Chandler has played a lot more years and is therefor eligible to earn more).
 
Would you guys do this trade? https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7m54jzf


I don't like Perkins contract though

I would immediately. Harden is an upgrade over Burks, and might always be. Perkins has a lower contract for a longer period of time but he will teach toughness and defense to Favors and Kanter. I seriously doubt OKC even answers the phone on this trade.

I bet we would have to throw in the GS pick and probably another pick for some future date.
 
To me this is the same thing as all those people yesterday saying you have to throw this and that many quarters in the air and if so and so quarters land on heads, than the Jazz will get the 8th pick. When in reality, 27% is 27% and its all relative.

What I'm trying to say is you can argue semantics all day long but when it comes right down to it, two teams are gonna walk out on that court and when it comes game time, if I'm the Thunder, I want the best 5 guys on my squad. Period.

This isn't about semantics, this is about financial reality. Look at Miami they have basically three max players and can't sign anymore because it would cause them to pay a huge luxury tax. Every team wants to put the best 5 guys on the floor but they can't because of $$$$ concerns. It is the main reason why the Lakers got rid of Odom. Sorry U gotta get a clue but the NBA is a business and every franchise has to consider the financials when making personnel decisions.

That is why I always point out to certain Jazz fans when they say bring this guy in and pay him the MAX and then bring this guy in and pay him the MAX. It sounds nice but then when Favors, Kanter, Hayward etc come up for their contracts there is no money left.
 
Eh, I'm an all in type of guy.

We saw it with our own Jazz how fast your championship window can close.

I understand financial prudence and being salary cautious, but at the end of the day, isnt it a game? isnt it about putting the best 5 guys out on the court who are gonna give you those blood, sweat and tears to hopefully win a championship title? If its not about that, then what are you even doing?

btw, I can certainly see the conservative argument and I'm not trying to argue with you, just getting my point across.

Based upon your comments, It is obvious that you don't understand the financial side of the NBA at all.
 
Back
Top