I hope you noticed the phrase "...limit their weekly consumption of fish.". To me that indicates that taking/consuming mercury in large amounts is harmful. So perhaps moderation is a good place to start.
Looks like the "vaccine argument" just got a little more interesting.
- Thread starter TheSilencer1313
- Start date
I hope you noticed the phrase "...limit their weekly consumption of fish.". To me that indicates that taking/consuming mercury in large amounts is harmful. So perhaps moderation is a good place to start.
1) The "mercury content" was a compound (thimerisol) easily disposed of by the body.
2) Thimerisol was removed from childhood vaccines close to a decade ago. It's removal did not aqffect autism rates in the slightest.
3) Under the most favorable conditions possible, that one side failed to prove any sort of link at all between vaccines and that "whole host" of problems, outside of the already agreed-to side effects.
Actually, they say there is no evidence, no reason to believe, and no particular reason why there should be a link. There are possible ways, but none of them have panned out.
To which preservative do you refer?
For example , thimerisol is still used in flu vaccines, so there would be inserts there, but no longer in childhood vaccines.
I don't recall using the word "harrowing". I made the comparison to emphasize that I thought circumcision was not "harrowing".
I used harrowing not you. I was just poking fun at you.
Squalene comes from shark livers, and is produced in human cells. I thought you liked the stuff that came from Mother Nature?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squalene
Nope, no mercury.
It's true squalene boosts the immune system, and an immune system that is too boosted leads to an auto-immune disorder. However, I thought you were a fan of boosted immune systems?
Sorry, I'm humor-impaired. I'm thinking about getting an implant.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Agreed.
But what do you think these so-called "cons" are actually getting out of this?
Personal satisfaction?
Considering mother nature is the exact entity that keeps you alive with food and water, makes the first statement sound a little absurd.
The companies making the drugs only priority is to make more money, and they'll keep you alive enough to continue to be hooked on their concoction.
Without mother nature, there would be no humans to oversee these cute little pills and shoot-me-ups.
Ok. I'm asking.
Yep, they seem to work for some and not for others.
Are you sure this is the goal?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWoAtKng8Gk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Name one site you get information from that does not sell prodcuts for a considerable mark-up.
She keeps predators alive, as well. It's the man-made stuff that keeps you from being prey.
I could type fifteen paragraphs. Could you be more specific?
Hence reason #2. Most vaccines are in the 95% effectiveness range.
You asked my reasons, not "the goal".
I don't have access to youtube here, so if your link made a point, perhaps you would care to say it?
I'm 50. That's a more attractive proposition than you might realize.
Lol, go for it! You've earned it. My hair is beginning to go grey and the wrinkles are starting to slowly build but I don't care.
I still have decades left.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
The only comment that was correct here was the thimerisol statement, which is not easily disposed of by the body, but collects in the brain.
https://m.naturalnews.com/news/030868_vaccines_autism.html
Well of course they say "no reason to believe".
Until like you said before, 10 years down the road they say "Whoops, I guess the adjuvents ARE actually causing problems."
All the preservatives, and adjuvents are listed in the above article.
Childhood vaccines no longer, but most vaccines above 5 years old.... most definitely yes.
So you're saying there is a chance of negative effects.
There is a history of fatalities from Whooping Cough, etc.
We are weighing a chance of negative side effects versus children dying. Doesn't mean we should continue to improve vaccines but the cost of not using them is too high.
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Introducing Squalene into the body via a shot doesn't work correctly, and the body can then attack natural squalene in the body.
https://sharonkgilbert.com/?p=786
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
TheSilencer1313
Well-Known Member
Yes, if you're not healthy in the first place.
There's also a history of fatalities from the common cold.
Thimerosal breaks down into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Neither of those accumulate in the body.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylmercury
Actually, they never said that. What they said was "Damn, a lot of people are upset over this. It's easier and cheaper to remove thimerosal than to educate the public".
Since there is no recorded observances of adult-onset autism of which I am aware, why does it matter if teens/adults have vaccines with thimerosal?
Correctly for what?
Otherwise healthy people die from whooping cough, measles, mumps, etc. It's pure denial to pretend they do not.