The further Burke slips the better IMO.
I have been guessing Burke goes around 14 all along.. give or take a spot or two.
The further Burke slips the better IMO.
I have been guessing Burke goes around 14 all along.. give or take a spot or two.
Yep. MCW has the potential to go a few spots higher, IMO.
The top 2 spots obviously belong to Noel/Shabazz, but who would you guys take at #3? It seems like whoever lands the third pick is going to have a tough decision.
MCW, Burkes and Hayward would make for a good-passing team.
Agree .. though I don't see much difference between the two regarding BPA.
Won't be popular here, but BenMc is looking really good. CZeller at 3 is somewhat obvious.
Basically .. if I had a pick from 3 - 9 I'd look to move down .. there's just not enough separation from 3 - 15, imo..
Agree with all of this. MCW vs Burke will come down to whether the team picking wants the higher risk, higher reward player (MCW) or the safe bet (Burke).
I like what I've seen of Mclemore. Top 3 seems kinda high, but then again, Beal went #3 last year, and they're fairly similar prospects.
Kinda high, yes, but because you could insert any of 8 or 9 names at 3 ..
MCW, Burkes and Hayward would make for a good-passing team.
lol, then we agree ..
Have two people ever agreed on this site prior to now? New milestone??
We better enjoy it while it lasts, it'll take another 21,100 posts till the next time![]()
Koke?
other thread
I'm concerned that the Jazz are going to make the playoffs as a 7th or 8th seed and miss out on a player they want in the draft.
Minnesota gets no Love.
Lakers are fading.
All we have to do is catch Portland and we're in.
It would be a win-win if we traded Al or Sap in a deal that involves a pick, since we'd have our own lotto pick too.