b_line
Well-Known Member
I think when Dennis Lindsay said that the Jazz didn't give Ty "A's" in every category, he acknowledged that not everything was done exactly correct, and that there were some things to work on. I do think, though, that Jerry Sloan grew in the 30 something years he was coaching, what about that crappy two years he had in Chicago before they fired him? Why was he an assistant coach after being a head coach? Ty Corbin is growing. Who knows, he might even be better than Jerry was when he first started coaching. The problem we have now days is that every single move a coach makes is questioned by everyone on social media within like three seconds. Ty is going to improve, and if he doesn't, well then we will probably get a new coach, that is usually how things work.
If you want to say that the Jazz are not an organization who changes coaches like everyone else, maybe you have some credence. But wouldn't any organization keep Jerry Sloan around if he wanted to stay? I mean come on, he is like top five in coaching talent of all time. Are the Jazz an organization who likes to keep the talent around? Sure, if they want to be here like Stockton and Malone, they would love to have them around, but the way we have been shuffling through players lately, makes me think that the Jazz are objective, and trying to find what pieces work and which ones don't.
If you want to say that the Jazz are not an organization who changes coaches like everyone else, maybe you have some credence. But wouldn't any organization keep Jerry Sloan around if he wanted to stay? I mean come on, he is like top five in coaching talent of all time. Are the Jazz an organization who likes to keep the talent around? Sure, if they want to be here like Stockton and Malone, they would love to have them around, but the way we have been shuffling through players lately, makes me think that the Jazz are objective, and trying to find what pieces work and which ones don't.