Last spring, when the Golden State Warriors were redefining the acceptable parameters of tanking and Harrison Barnes was redefining the boundaries of how badly I could troll a player on my beloved Carolina Tar Heels, I wrote a series of columns stating the Warriors were doing the NBA a disservice and that Barnes was a bust. Around that time, I recall a friend joking that the best possible outcome would be if the Warriors tanked their way into the middle of the lottery and picked up Barnes. That way, my two beloved hatreds could be intertwined forever. If Barnes ended up being an NBA bust, the specious logic of sports predictions and the Internet record would vindicate me forever.
So here's my apology. I still stand by my assertion that what the Warriors did to get the seventh pick in the draft was beyond reproach. Sitting all your good players with fake injuries and then starting five rookies in the last game of the season (which, by the way, was Fan Night at Oracle) was a new nadir for competitive integrity in the NBA. And I do not think the fact that Barnes now seems well on his way to becoming a very good NBA player somehow validates the Warriors' behavior.
https://www.grantland.com/blog/the-...ayoffs-shootaround-the-monocle-and-the-falcon
Like I said. **** the Warriors. Forever.
As for this notion that liking the Warriors is serving as a referendum to the Jazz, what the Warriors did last year was not just go young, it was a bald-faced yet dishonest tank, it was shameful and embarrassing for the league, for their organization, AND IT ****ED THE JAZZ. They're lower than the Blazers, and it's not even close.
And Mark Jackson is a turd. When the players tune him out, he'll be better served shouting empty platitudes from a pulpit.