Dal I have a question. When I lived in Great Falls, MT, I knew a guy there who would do the emergency flights for a hospital, which was an excellent hospital and serves a large region. He brought a LOT of people down there though from southern Alberta. Do you think that is due to quality of healthcare, or simply because Lethbridge, Medicine Hat, etc. are simply closer to GF than to Edmonton or Calgary?
I ask because I know your high intelligence and current enrollment in Canadian med school. I know the education is certainly on par, but are the resources as well?
A few things:
- I am applying for medical school-- I am not yet enrolled. Writing my MCAT this summer, and probably applying at the end of next year *cross yo finguz 4 me*
- I am not really that intelligent, nor am I the best voice for this, but I'll give it a crack
Distance-wise, they're a wash. I think via chopper, you probably have a quicker flight to Great Falls than you do to Calgary, from Lehtbridge. But the healthcare is free within the province, so I can't imagine that the patient seeking medical attention would want to actually spend money, unless it was for a given reason.
Now, I am admittedly unaware with the specific quality of healthcare in Calgary. I also know that there is a growing trend towards less public investment in healthcare, so the University of Alberta is relying on privatized investment in order continue expanding the strength of its medical treatment.
Here's a building on campus (I'm on campus right now):
The Mazankowski Heart institute. As per their website, "The Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute has become one of Canada’s leading heart centers in the prevention and treatment of heart disease. It offers comprehensive cardiac surgery, cardiology services and patient education. The Mazankowski is the nucleus for highly skilled cardiac care professionals, researchers and educators". As someone who volunteers in this hospital, it
really is quite advanced, and it certainly costed a LOT of money.
Theres other buildings, like the Darryl Katz Group Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, or the Li Ka Shing institute of Virology (both famous billionaires, with the former being the owner of the Edmonton Oilers, and the latter being a top-10 Forbes list dude).
So if anything, Alberta of all provinces REALLY shouldn't be suffering from lack of investment, or resources from the private and public sectors-- the oil-sands are supplying enormous amounts of wealth to the province, and theres billion-dollar medical-related buildings sprouting up left and right.
So, to answer your question: The education is most-certainly on par, without a doubt. My friend just got into Stanford medical school, and hell be pursuing a post-doctorate fellowship at Johns Hopkins University-- and return back to Edmonton. This is quite common-- so the staff at many of these hospitals have a U of A med degree at worst (a quite good degree, mind you), with numerous having finished their education at some of the best schools in the world.
So it isn't lack of funding, or lack of credentials. I think the main problem is that sometimes the service can take a hit, because youre trying to make medical treatment as affordable for everyone as possible. So thats when you hear stories about Canadian citizens having to wait 3 months for MRIs, not being able to start cancer treatment until later, and so on.
But guess what? If you want to get your MRI right away, pay for it. If you want better cancer treatment, pay for it.
People from the states like to criticize our healthcare-- but the fact of the matter is, is that private healthcare plans are EXTREMELY prevalent, and every person is free to choose a slew of different treatment plans for them. If they're too poor to have their cardiac arrest treated in the best hospital in north america-- its okay. Someone in Edmonton will do a pretty good attempt at it. Maybe you'll need to wait a little, and maybe the doctors credentials won't be up to par. But you'll be getting very passable service, at zero price.
To me, this seems better than in the states, where you're counting on privatized healthcare for everyone-- and the tens of millions who don't have it have NO option. Not to mention the hijinx regarding there being different hospitals to people with different economic standings. Here, everyone goes to the same hospitals. Those who are wealthy might choose a doctor based in Chicago for example-- and their reasons are certainly credible. We don't have the best doctors in the world, and we don't have the best sources of funding. But what I am trying to say is, the actual treatment
itself is MORE than suitable for every citizen living in Alberta-- again, I'm speaking about the hospitals in Edmonton. Don't know how Calgary compares.
The only thing that is a huge problem is wait-times, in my opinion. Probably the biggest problem with health-care in Alberta. But again, I'd rather wait, then get nothing at all.