I have. I have watched the video and listened to the tape. What huge discrepancy is there? The dispatcher was recently put on the stand and told the jury that he is not authorized to give orders for liability reasons. So I chalk that up as bad judgement on the part of Zimmerman. That being said, Zimmerman could be guilty. I don't know either way. That's the problem. None of us really know. I don't see how you can convict a guy with what has come out from the witnesses(Martin being on top of Zimmerman and Zimmerman calling for help as one witness said). So far there's been nothing I have heard or seen that makes me think this case should have been prosecuted. Public outcry due to the media is really what forced them to prosecute this case.
Most alarming is where he says he was when the dispatcher says we don't need you to follow him.
They say it very soon after he opens his car door, and starts going after him. In the video he is pretty far away from his car.
Big difference. He was right by his car, had he goes back this night doesn't go down like it did.
In the video he is far away, and its dark, they tell him stop following. That's just not what happened in the call.
It's 10 seconds after his door closes that the officer is telling him he doesn't need to follow. There is no way he is where he is
in the reenactment video.
He then states that he was "in the area" that was the reason why he was following him? Really George?
Listening to the police tape it seemed like it was because he was "runnin"
"I told non emergency he was gone, I lost him" not on the call
"well If hes not there do you still want a police officer" not on the call
they already told him officers were on the way, that was never in question.
It just doesn't match up with the call.
Where is the person that Zimmerman said opened the door.
"somebody here opened the door....and I said help me help me, and they said ill call 911"
Where is that witness.
