So if Zimmerman walks, what is the over/under on A) How long he lives before somebody exacts their "revenge"? B) How long/big the riots will be?
Neither will happen.
So if Zimmerman walks, what is the over/under on A) How long he lives before somebody exacts their "revenge"? B) How long/big the riots will be?
Neither will happen.
I think the posibility of some riots is possible.
Good job recapping the majority opinion. Bold move.
I can see demonstrations, I think the reality of the matter will prevent any large scale rioting. Anyone who's paying attention to the trial knows that the prosecution has not proved anything beyond reasonable doubt. If it was clear that this was 100% not self-defense I could see a stronger reaction, but I think it's obvious Zimmerman shot Trayvon in the heat of a physical altercation, one in which Zimmerman was injured. That right there makes a guilty verdict pretty much impossible based on the state seeking 2nd degree murder.
True but you are expecting people to act with their heads. I don't, I think it will be all emotion and it will feed upon itself and lead to rioting.
I can see demonstrations, I think the reality of the matter will prevent any large scale rioting. Anyone who's paying attention to the trial knows that the prosecution has not proved anything beyond reasonable doubt. If it was clear that this was 100% not self-defense I could see a stronger reaction, but I think it's obvious Zimmerman shot Trayvon in the heat of a physical altercation, one in which Zimmerman was injured. That right there makes a guilty verdict pretty much impossible based on the state seeking 2nd degree murder.
You were pretty solid in this opinion before the trial, facts be damned, you're sticking to it.
This sounds stupid but even if he's totally innocent court should find him guilty of something and give him some prison time.
No.
It's because your response was quite honestly the dumbest assessment of the situation as I've ever read. Damn that Martin! Why didnt he just understand that Zimmermann was following him on a nice friendly jog and merely wanted to meet a new friend? A running buddy?
Anyone who has been on a "friendly jog" knows the difference between this and being stalked.
Again, lets stop making this a racial or political issue and just stick to the facts. Thanks gamers and happy independence!
This is ridiculous. You make the claim that Zimmerman is legally innocent(quite likely true, whether I like it or not), but you also make the claim that he is morally innocent. Then you come up with his gem. Are you actually suggesting that as long as everything Zimmerman did was legal, he cannot have done something immoral?
If I were to walk up to a random man at a restaurant who is having dinner with his wife and 16-year old daughter, I could legally stand next to him and tell him in graphic details what nasty, German-porn kind of things I would do to his very-much-of-legal-age daughter(given her consent, naturally). I could also legally keep my finger a few inches from his eye while laughing and chanting "Not touching you. Not touching you. Ha-ha-ha!" I could then legally follow him out of the restaurant while he and his family walk two blocks to their car. I could then legally get into my car(by a fortuitous coincidence, it is next to theirs) and follow the family to their house in some cul-de-sac. I could then legally park my car on the public street in front of their house with lights on and spend the entire night there.
All these things are legal, but do I not at some point acquire moral responsibility for any and every outcome of this ridiculous situation? Or is it all cool if I'm not breaking the law?
Good job recapping the majority opinion. Bold move.
So if Zimmerman walks, what is the over/under on A) How long he lives before somebody exacts their "revenge"? B) How long/big the riots will be?
The defense got the OK to talk about the mary jane found in Martin's system.
The defense got the OK to talk about the mary jane found in Martin's system.
It's such a minimal amount I'm stunned they would bring it up, unless there are some reefer madness idiots on the jury.
The report is they found 1.5 nanograms of THC in his system. To fail a UA for weed, the standard that most drug testing companies use is 40-50 nanograms. And THC is notorious for staying in the fatty cells of a body...many people fail drug tests even after abstaining for a week or two.
This would be like saying someone is drinking after taking a quarter of a teaspoon of some low alcohol crap beer like Budweiser. Sure, I guess they are technically drinking, but to suggest they are intoxicated any way is just idiotic. Though I guess the defense found someone in the state of Florida dumb enough to believe it, though it is Florida.
Not sure if it was brought up in here but a forensic expert testified for the defense. He said that when the shot was fired Martin's shirt and hoodie were a couple inches off his skin. That indicated that Martin was leaning over ZImmerman when he was shot. That would place Zimmerman on his back and Martin over him.
That's one way to look at it. It could also mean Zimmerman had a handful of shirt/jacket in one hand when he shot him with the other.
I don't get why so many are demanding that Zimmerman live with guilt the rest of his life. If he's innocent and acted in self defense then what is there to be guilty of?
I don't get why so many are demanding that Zimmerman live with guilt the rest of his life. If he's innocent and acted in self defense then what is there to be guilty of?
While everything that happend once Martin and Zimmerman engaged one another is up for debate, the bottom line is the moment before that occurred Martin was doing nothing wrong and it was fully appropriate for him to be where he was. For the person who took his life, I think these facts would weigh heavy even on the hardest souls.