What's new

Following potential 2014 draftees

Here's a thought.

Say we DO get Wiggins in the draft. How much would that increase the chances of good free agents coming to Utah?

Sent from my SPH-L720 using JazzFanz mobile app
Wouldn't happen right away. If he ends up playing to the same level as the hype, then yes. I think it would help us
**** you, Dala. Way to always ride the coattails of the majority and mediocrity.
I'm rooting hard for Kentucky this year. I don't want Randle or Andrew thinking they have unfinished business or anything.
btw, Randle's line thus far.....

45 points, 29 rebounds, 55 minutes
is that all:)
 
Not sure if this has been posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjQEx2glztg


Ugh, does he always fake and come back the other side? Why can't he explode over the undersized, out of position defender?

He shoots very low, he needs to learn to get the ball up.
 
A lot of you are concerned about shooting, and rightfully so.

If we add Parker to this team, or Wiggins do we have enough shooters?

I'm assuming it would be Burke, Hayward, Wiggins/Parker, Kanter, Favors. Would teams pack the paint, and succeed?
 
Predictions for Tuesday's games;

UK - MichSt
Sparty uglies things up and makes it a grind it out game.
UK - 67
MSU - 73

KU - Duke
KU - 71
Duke - 77
 
Help me out here. What makes Wiggins the #1? Being able to jump higher? I see zero advantages for Wiggins after that.

Smaller than Parker and Randle. Parker better at posting up, at worst they are equal on shooting, but right now I'd say Parker is better. Parker seems more versatile. Handles the ball about equal, Parker seems like a much better teammate.

Randle is way more of a mismatch, handles the ball very well for a big guy, better defense, about equal on shooting, #hunger.

Now all the scouts can't be wrong, so what am I missing? Why is Wiggins the consensus #1? What does he have that the others don't?
 
Help me out here. What makes Wiggins the #1? Being able to jump higher? I see zero advantages for Wiggins after that.

Smaller than Parker and Randle. Parker better at posting up, at worst they are equal on shooting, but right now I'd say Parker is better. Parker seems more versatile. Handles the ball about equal, Parker seems like a much better teammate.

Randle is way more of a mismatch, handles the ball very well for a big guy, better defense, about equal on shooting, #hunger.

Now all the scouts can't be wrong, so what am I missing? Why is Wiggins the consensus #1? What does he have that the others don't?


Wiggins vertical definately plays a part (because it IS in fact a huge vertical), but he also has great size and length, good speed, decent jump shot, good handles, amazing spin move in the lane, and the POTENTIAL to be a great defender.
 
Wiggins vertical definately plays a part (because it IS in fact a huge vertical), but he also has great size and length, good speed, decent jump shot, good handles, amazing spin move in the lane, and the POTENTIAL to be a great defender.

Also, and i might be wrong, I think he is younger than parker?
 
Back
Top