barefoot? yes, i can see him being tad under 6ft 8. kevin love was 6ft 7 3/4.
And this is concerning?
Probably is in the world of Fatbrey where being a quarter inch smaller than the opponent means you are overmatched
barefoot? yes, i can see him being tad under 6ft 8. kevin love was 6ft 7 3/4.
And this is concerning?
Probably is in the world of Fatbrey where being a quarter inch smaller than the opponent means you are overmatched
![]()
Cause OG is coming to town
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];781554 said:and he'll be sitting on the bench during crunch time unless he fixes a lot of things.
You can't go wrong with either.
Parker isn't going to be a bust. It just depends on how much (higher) a ceiling you think wiggins has. Honestly, it is the difference between Paul George and a young Paul Pierce.
One will immediately be a terror on defense and on the break. One will immediately be a player you can run your offense through.
One requires time and polishing to become a complete player. While the other requires more of a slower paced (playoff) system and perhaps a rim protector.
Wiggins stat line was incredible today. And his ceiling is through the roof. But let's not forget that Jabari can score from anywhere and still has yet to scratch the surface of his post game. A solid post game will control the tempo and stay with him even once his athleticism begins to fail.
I honestly think either is a win win. I might lean more towards wiggins doe
i have him at #5. i could easily bump him to top 4 again with strong showing in march. if randle measures at 6ft 9 245lb, i would pick him at #1 in a heartbeat. but i know he isn't that tall.
with 6ft 6 1/4 - 6ft 7 melo. melo was measured at 6ft 6 1/4.
![]()
size matters to randle's game especially when he isn't a leaper and doesn't appear to have freaky long arms. that's the difference between going #1 and being top 5-7. i know, i'm splitting hairs, but that's what GMs do - splitting hairs.
stauskas misses alot of easy layups.
I agree with you. Randle's size is his biggest detriment. To me, he's like a more developed Millsap at this point. So if he puts in at least the work Millsap did/does, he will def be good.
Randle is considerably more athletic than Millsap, both in lateral speed and hops, lets not undersell him here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiJDErUMXhs
Another reason why he is similar to Hayward!