What's new

The reasons I will no longer make threads that need help from fellow Jazzfanz posters!

Anyway, I got an infraction last week which was completely and utterly ****ing garbage. That hack catracho gave it to me. It was incredibly bogus. But I didnt contest it because I know the gestapo is not going reverse it. Im sure Sloan Brow is or was behind it. That dude has it out for me after I completely decimated him on the board when talking about his boy, Sloan. Whatever. "This place is dead anyway..."

Grito más duro, hack.
 
Anyway, I got an infraction last week which was completely and utterly ****ing garbage. That hack catracho gave it to me. It was incredibly bogus. But I didnt contest it because I know the gestapo is not going reverse it. Im sure Sloan Brow is or was behind it. That dude has it out for me after I completely decimated him on the board when talking about his boy, Sloan. Whatever. "This place is dead anyway..."

Bro, don't even email them about it. You're wasting your "breath." Other than Kicky, no one will get back to you with anything other than some response template.
 
if the grasp of basic logic you display here is indicative of anything, i'm sure you will have a long, storied, and successful career :)
 
Bro, don't even email them about it. You're wasting your "breath." Other than Kicky, no one will get back to you with anything other than some response template.

I will gladly have a civilized discussion with anybody who has questions about a warning or infraction received.
 
Of course not bra, I love you. In fact I hadn't even looked back at that thread since I posted. But let's face facts, I like eating dogs, and I don't like eating dongs, especially dong-dongs.

Ok, then I love you to and respect any life style choice you choose to make.
 
I'm going to step in here at the expense of sticking my neck out for back lashings Michael Fay-esque. Unless that thread was altered, I saw nothing in Clutch's post that was meant to be hurtful, bigoted, or intolerant in any way whatsoever. As a personal suggestion that I'm sure doesn't mean much, and probably shouldn't based on my caustic temperament, maybe moderators can consider context a little more and character or board history a little less. Clutch made a wise crack that fit well into the context of that thread. This was an example of the character of this forum which makes it exceptional. I would hate to see the character be derailed by PC driven moderating policies, or by minority agenda just to kowtow to a few.

I want to be clear that I highly respect the moderating practices here, and find them highly superior, tediously so, to other forums I've frequented and generally found intolerant, lazy, etc. (you pick the mold). With that said, I also think the recent inundation of complaints may be a sign that things are getting out of hand. Again, I'm expressing this sincerely and with respect.

--Craig *******
 
, maybe moderators can consider context a little more and character or board history a little less.

Actually, context was the primary driver behind that particular decision.

Clutch had made a fair number of "on the line" comments previously in reaction to the recent reminder to decrease homophobic comments and "gay jokes" and in particular was making a lot of comments referring to safetydan's statements about being raised by two women. Clutch had also received previous infractions under the "inappropriate content" rules. As a general matter, we have less tolerance for people who violate rules repeatedly than ones who cross the line rarely because there's an implication that they're willfully pushing the envelope.

For the record, this wasn't a close one given the larger context.

Five infraction votes (two more than necessary) and no one voted for anything other than infraction.
 
Can you answer my questions?

I will not do it in a public forum. This is simply not the place to do it. If you (or any other poster) wants to PM me with questions about infractions and/or warnings, they can feel free to do it. Just a warning though, I usually only get on here once a day, before 8 am mountain time.
 
...I have been the most unjustly maligned poster on this board over the years! On that, there can be no question or debate!

Oh, I don't know. There have been a lot of people claiming to be victims. Maybe we should have a contest and people can try super hard to be the biggest victim on the board. What an honor that would be!
 
by the way, I respond to inquiries in the order in which they are received. If you wish to send me a PM with your concerns, you can count on getting a personalized response from me.
Date

Reference

Dear ………

I am writing in reference to your recent inquiry.

Firstly I apologize for the inconvenience/distress/problems created by any error or failure on our part.

We take great care to ensure that important matters such as this are properly managed/processed/implemented. Due to various undisclosed factors, on this occasion an acceptable standard has clearly not been met and we have clearly not succeeded in meeting your expectations.

In light of this, we have decided to resolve this issue in a manner which we hope will be acceptable to you, and hope also that this will provide a basis for continuing our relationship.

I will contact you soon to check that this meets with your approval. Please contact me should you have any further cause for concern.

Sincerely,

moevillini
 
Back
Top