♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Flawed logic. No one believes everything with a heartbeat is human. Everything with a heartbeat also has a brain of some kind.
The heartbeat argument ain't about whether a fetus is a "human," it is about whether a fetus is a "life" with constitutional protections.
If you go with the brain over heartbeat argument you would come into the degree of development problem as well.
If you had a heart transplant you would be the same person. If you had a brain transplant you would be essentially donating your body to someone else. A human brain is something special because it is the lump of flesh thatcontains who we are.
There would be disagreements about development but right now there are disagreements anyway. My understanding is that at 24 weeks what makes a fetus not viable is underdeveloped lungs. I think we should ask ourselves a hypothetical "If all other organs were developed enough for survival would this fetus have reasonable brain function." We may disagree a little on the answer to that question but if we are being honest we should be close.