What's new

Where is that pit bull thread when I need it?

https://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/04/prweb11731315.htm
.
Evidently Utah's lawmaker's agree with the group defending pit bulls. It is now illegal for cities to ban breeds of dogs. Along with 19 other states so far.

The bill sponsored by Rep. Brian King, protects pet owner property rights and allows responsible citizens to own any breed of dog they choose.

Now you know who not to vote for. What a moron. I think I'll go buy a couple of purebred wolves, buy a house next to a preschool, and leave my gates open full time.

As responsible adults, we can choose to drink alcohol if we want -- any kind -- but as soon as it affects other people, we go to jail. Pitbulls are the drunk driver version of K9's.
 
Now you know who not to vote for. What a moron. I think I'll go buy a couple of purebred wolves, buy a house next to a preschool, and leave my gates open full time.

As responsible adults, we can choose to drink alcohol if we want -- any kind -- but as soon as it affects other people, we go to jail. Pitbulls are the drunk driver version of K9's.

that just makes you an *******. and not dogs or wolves!
 
Now you know who not to vote for. What a moron. I think I'll go buy a couple of purebred wolves, buy a house next to a preschool, and leave my gates open full time.

As responsible adults, we can choose to drink alcohol if we want -- any kind -- but as soon as it affects other people, we go to jail. Pitbulls are the drunk driver version of K9's.

Don't forget the "hungry for little children and chee wah wah's" signs.
 
huevosjh9.jpg
 
Now you know who not to vote for. What a moron. I think I'll go buy a couple of purebred wolves, buy a house next to a preschool, and leave my gates open full time.

As responsible adults, we can choose to drink alcohol if we want -- any kind -- but as soon as it affects other people, we go to jail. Pitbulls are the drunk driver version of K9's.
So he is a moron for protecting people's rights? Why should some stupid *** city be able to infringe on the rights of people to own the dog they want. Just because a few people don't like it. Should not have had to make this law in the 1st place. It should have been unnecessary.
 
https://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/03/...-save-phoenix-pit-bull-who-mauled-4-year-old/

Interesting read.

Kevin was hospitalized at Maricopa Medical Center with a broken eye socket, cheek bone and lower jaw bone, according to doctors.

Dr. Salvatore Lettieri, a Mayo Clinic physician and chief of cosmetic surgery at Maricopa Medical Center, said he was able to fix the broken bones and reattach the muscles that allow Kevin to open and close his eye.

"He still can't open his eye. We'll need to fix the tear duct drainage system — that is if he makes tears," Lettieri said.

Apparently the dog owner's rights to own a dangerous dog outweighed the child's rights to not be mauled and mutilated. Makes sense, right?

That is an interesting thing about the discussion around rights in cases like this, and even gun control and other topics. For one person to exercise their unfettered right it can put others' rights at risk. I guess the question is, how much are you willing to risk to maintain that right?
 
People are pretty smart and use extreme caution and forethought before doing anything dangerous or owning anything that could be dangerous.
We need to trust people to make the right decisions.

Link
 
Haven't been following this thread. Anyway, we've got a 4.5 month old Doberman. They look mean, but they're actually in the average side as far as aggression goes.
 
Back
Top