What?
Pretty low blow for someone who served his country with integrity. You expect tolerance from people but obviously don't tolerate the alternative opinion. Pathetic.
This!!!!
Once again, Katie's hypocrisy is pretty glaring.
But that's ok, we don't have to be tolerant to John McCain. He shares an opinion that I don't agree with. Maybe we should ban John McCain? I want to see the katie apologists bail her out of this one. They always seemed to have an excuse. What's their excuse going to be this time? Did John McCain drive thousands of homosexuals to commit suicide too just like Bro Packer?
sigh....
I do agree w/McCain in one respect, doesn't the military have enough to deal with already? I guess fighting 2 wars is easy anyway....
I don't think you understand how bigotry or prejudice works or why it's relevant to the rules of this site or society at large. I'll also address Marcus, Clutch, and Hopper since I'm nearly positive he's still lurking.
Taking issue with something someone has said, a stance they've made, or an action committed is reactionary and valid. Taking issue with the benign nature of a person's existence is not. How is this confusing?
Nobody has a problem with McCain because he served in war, but he doesn't get a free pass on every issue for the rest of his life because of that, either. He's done some transparently pandering and cowardly things over the years just as he's done some great things. Katie's argument is not that he's bad because he's straight, or white, or something that he doesn't have control over. Attacking the things he has control over - just as anyone else's - is fair game.
Also, how does having a policy of kicking out 'our' service members equate to helping 'our' war? Also, Packer is a hateful piece of garbage that is out of touch with even the religion he represents. He's the Beantown of the presidency of The Church.
My guess is that ending Don't ask, Don't tell will have little to no effect in how gays serve in the military. The overwhelming majority will choose to keep it to themselves.
This IMO is a totally different situation though. I guess I hope I get proven wrong on this one. But I have known my fair share of soldiers who are very homophobic.
Pretty low blow for someone who served his country with integrity. You expect tolerance from people but obviously don't tolerate the alternative opinion. Pathetic.
You mean you think the soldiers of the post-WWII weren't very racist?
I mean that homophobia is going to be more of an issue in the military going forward than the race issues post WWII.
Why? Just a guess?
Tolerating differences is not the same as tolerating bigotry.
Just from knowing a few soldiers and knowing their opinions. I am okay with getting rid of don't ask, don't tell and I hope I am wrong and there aren't any incidents. I guess we'll see.
Katie's argument is not that he's bad because he's straight, or white, or something that he doesn't have control over. Attacking the things he has control over - just as anyone else's - is fair game.