spycam1
Well-Known Member
Lol you took Westbrook early.
You have such weird takes on players.
Westbrook is one of the very select few players who are two-way superstars.
Lol you took Westbrook early.
You have such weird takes on players.
Westbrook is one of the very select few players who are two-way superstars.
The thing with picking Duncan @ 5 is that most people will try and get their team's primary playmaker with the 1st pick. This is something Duncan really doesn't do anymore. However, he is probably the best player in the NBA with a usage rate under 25 from the last season. So you could take a lower-tier #1 option in the second round (plenty left) and not be at a disadvantage because you have Tim Duncan with that person. Hotttnickkk certainly didn't screw himself over with his pick, and I don't think it's as bad as I initially thought. It just seems odd to take the best complementary player available (imo) at #5 impo. It makes even more sense when you think about how much of a crapshoot it appeared to be after Lebron and Durant. Not much difference in perceived value between these players.
Who does Westbrook shutdown on defense?
Does he really contribute that much on defense?
Yes, he does. It's hard to have discussions like this at this stage in the draft cause I think it's dumb to mention players that haven't been picked yet, but he's easily a better two-way star than anyone else available.
Westbrook wouldn't be a stretch at all in the top 5. Certainly not any more than Davis.
Davis > Westbrook next year
Well, that better be the case. You picked Davis 3rd and Westbrook was picked 8th. So if Davis isn't better this year, then that's pretty ****ty drafting on your part.
![]()
He puts up damn near LeBron numbers while playing next to Durant for ****s sake.
If Lebron shot nearly 15% lower from the field, couldn't hit a 3 pointer, and regularly made bad decisions.
Where would you rank Westbrook?
![]()
He puts up damn near LeBron numbers while playing next to Durant for ****s sake.
14th
14th
lol no