I don't post often here, but I can't let this one go without a rebuttal. I don't doubt that you truly believe that Wilson is better, but let's take a look at the facts:
* Both have started 18 games in their career (Taysom has played in 22 games and Wilson 23)
* Passing Yards Taysom has 4,052 Wilson has 3,584
* Rushing Yards Taysom has 2,034 Wilson has 475
* Pass TD's Taysom has 27 Wilson has 29
* Rush TD's Taysom has 20 Wilson has 10
* Interceptions Taysom has 19 Wilson has 22
* QB Rating Taysom 122.3 Wilson 133.1
* Comp % Taysom 56.6 Wilson 59.5
* Pass attempts Taysom 572 Wilson 479
* 2012 SOS BYU 48 Utah 82 (Taysom started 2, Wilson 7)
* 2013 SOS BYU 40 Utah 31 (Taysom started 13, Wilson 9)
* 2014 SOS to date BYU 41 Utah 190 (Taysom started 3, Wilson 2)
* Record as starter Taysom 13-5 Wilson 9-9
Taysom has over 2,000 yards more in total offense, 8 more total TD's, 3 less interceptions, and 4 more wins in the same amount of starts. Wilson is a marginally more efficient passer, but Taysom is by far the more exciting and explosive player and can win games with his legs. The perception, however, is Wilson has played much tougher opponents, but that is not the case. Their overall SOS for their first 18 starts is very comparable. Wilson has played UCLA(0-2), Stanford (1-0), and USC(0-1), Arizona(0-2), Washington(0-1), BYU (1-0). Taysom has played Wisconsin(0-1), Notre Dame(0-1), Texas(2-0), Washington(0-1), Utah (0-1).
Wilson is a good QB and I hope he and the Utes do well this year with their gauntlet of a schedule, I really do. I graduated from the U and root for them except for when they play BYU. The reality is, Hill is the better overall QB, and it's really not even close.
Good post. I'll try to get back to it when I have time. I will say this, right off the bat. I only took stats from Wilson and Hill vs BCS teams from the last two years and I only used stats when Wilson could actually hold the ball. Because I don't care what his stats where when he couldn't grip the ball, because those games are completely irrelevant.
I know a lot of Wilson detractors love to point to those games to show he sucks, but that isn't the most intelligent thing to do, well, because it was a very unique situation. How often is a QB asked to play when he cannot grip the ball? Hardly ever. So, I don't care. You can care if you want to, because Wilson sucked in those games, as would any QB who could not grip the ball.
You did post Hil's overall stats, and that is great. He will have better stats, because his schedule is immensely easier. His opponents suck for the most part. He should have better stats. When you take away the crap opponents and just compare stats vs BCS teams and when Wilson can grip the ball, Wilson's stats are much better.
You mentioned SOS. That stat is crap. BYU gets a boost because they lost to ND, while Utah doesn't get that boost. Let's look at 2012 and the schedules that BYU and Utah played:
UCLA vs ND - ND is better
Oregon State vs Oregon State - Equal. BYU lost by more.
USC vs SJSU - USC is better
Arizona State vs Boise St - ASU is better
BYU vs Utah - Utah is better (duh)
Arizona vs Utah State - Arizona is better
Utah State vs Georgia Tech - USU is better
Washington vs SDSU - Washington is better
Cal vs Washington State - Cal is better
Washington State vs Hawaii - Wash St is better
Colorado vs Idaho - Colorado is better
Northern Colorado vs Weber St - Northern Colorado is better
Yet, you're telling me that BYU's schedule was almost twice as hard as Utah's that year. Seriously? Do you honestly believe that BYU's schedule was harder that year, let alone twice as hard? Utah played 9 BCS teams (10 if you count BYU) and BYU played 5. Yet, BYU had the harder schedule?
Do you not believe that Utah wins 9-10 games with BYU's harder schedule, yet was only able to win 5 games with the easier schedule?
SOS is crap in this case.