What's new
By:

2014 College Football

LazyD said:
That won't happen. I'm still not sure a PAC team is top 8 worthy. Probably would be loaded with SEC teams, FSU, Baylor, OU
Click to expand...

I think an 8 game playoff is inevitable. More eyeballs. More excitement. More markets. More $$$$$$$$$.
 
I hope it stays at 4. If teams want a chance to win it all, then they should be one of the best 4 teams during the season.
 
Ty dawg. I think State is the most balanced team in the league and that is the key to their success.














sent from a phone ya bish
 
I want the Big 12 left out, which won't happen because I want them to see the writing on the wall and basically be forced to expand and add a title game for a couple of reasons:

- It doesn't seem like a level playing field to me when they're the only P5 conference that doesn't have the extra game. Some years it may hurt them, some years it might help them, but it will always be unbalanced.

- Expanding most likely means BYU gets an invite.

That last reason might seem strange coming from a BYU hater but not only do I think it improves football for fans across the state, it forces BYU and it fans to deal with reality.

BYU just lost an undefeated season and it's best player due to injury against a MWC school. I can't tell you how badly Utah's depth has been an issue since joining the PAC. More injuries and less depth than most of your conference foes makes for some pretty tough sledding.

Now BYU would slowly improve, like Utah is doing right now, but their fans have been mighty quick to laugh at Utah's struggles since joining the Pac. Let's see how they like losing their QB when Oklahoma, Baylor, and TCU still loom on the schedule.
 
jazzman12 said:
I want the Big 12 left out, which won't happen because I want them to see the writing on the wall and basically be forced to expand and add a title game for a couple of reasons:

- It doesn't seem like a level playing field to me when they're the only P5 conference that doesn't have the extra game. Some years it may hurt them, some years it might help them, but it will always be unbalanced.

- Expanding most likely means BYU gets an invite.

That last reason might seem strange coming from a BYU hater but not only do I think it improves football for fans across the state, it forces BYU and it fans to deal with reality.

BYU just lost an undefeated season and it's best player due to injury against a MWC school. I can't tell you how badly Utah's depth has been an issue since joining the PAC. More injuries and less depth than most of your conference foes makes for some pretty tough sledding.

Now BYU would slowly improve, like Utah is doing right now, but their fans have been mighty quick to laugh at Utah's struggles since joining the Pac. Let's see how they like losing their QB when Oklahoma, Baylor, and TCU still loom on the schedule.
Click to expand...
Eh, Big12 plays a true round robin. Why do they need a title game?
 
UGLI baby said:
Lol kiss of death.
Click to expand...

LOL. Probably. I think Auburn coming up is going to very tough because beating A&M was such a high and now they have to get right back up seven days later for another even tougher opponent.

Auburn to me may be more mentally prepared. They went to the title game last year and may feel they have unfinished business and be more familiar with how to mentally stay prepared week to week in the SEC.

But Cy's promoted Dak for forever now and he really is legit.
 
LazyD said:
I hope it stays at 4. If teams want a chance to win it all, then they should be one of the best 4 teams during the season.
Click to expand...
If they want a chance to win it all they should win their conference also. Can't be the best team in the country if you are not the best team in your own conference.
 
LazyD said:
I hope it stays at 4. If teams want a chance to win it all, then they should be one of the best 4 teams during the season.
Click to expand...

Best according to who? Just a bunch of people expressing an opinion that so far this year has meant jack ****. This week is a perfect example of why polls are pointless and that the championship should be decided on the field. Which means an expanded playoff.
 
I was not at all disappointed about the 4 team playoff because I believe it will eventually be a stepping stone for an 8 team playoff. That being said, if they do stay at 4 it is still so much better than the old system.
 
Last edited:
gregbroncs said:
If the champion of the 2nd best conference doesn't make the playoff and a team like Florida State who does not play a single team as good as the lower half of the pac 12 does then there is a problem. Hell even Michigan state lost to a Pac12 team that has fared far worse in their few pac12 games so far. So how is winning a pathetic Big 10 better than winning the pac 12 even with 2-3 losses?
Click to expand...
Yep.
Big 10 and acc suck balls
 
Cy said:
Damn, MSU is now ranked 3rd. Next week is going to be 3rd vs 2nd with the MSU vs. Auburn matchup. Crazy, whoever wins that could end up being ranked #1 if FSU loses.
Click to expand...
Even if fsu doesn't lose, the winner if that game could jump them
 
UGLI baby said:
8 is perfect IMO.

4 teams ain't a playoff
Click to expand...
Word.
4 Teams is lame. College football should have got it right in the first place but they always have to screw things up for a few years first, have a bunch of controversy, and then make a change
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top