I never understood the mindless "fire Corbin" crap. I liked it when people would give actual reasons as to why they didn't want to have Corbin around.
I didn't like Corbin for this iteration of the Jazz. These are the reasons I did not like him:
1. The team very clearly was suited to play a much faster game, both on offense and defense, and Corbin tried to slow the game down from the point guard on up to the big men. He wanted to use Favors in the post, where he was not suited well, and Hayward would stand on the wings and watch. Its seemed as though Corbin thought he had a system that would work no matter the personnel. That was not the case. He will probably learn to tailor his system to the players in the future, but he did not do that well in Utah.
2. The preferential treatment of veterans. This is a subject that a lot of people on this board took way overboard. It was a problem, but it was overblown. I didn't mind Marvin. I thought RJ should have played less, and I always thought we should invest more of the time in Favors. It was a problem with Corbin, but the young guys developed well considering the circumstances.
3. Lindsay has a plan for the organization, and it was not clear if Corbin agreed with it. In the NBA, it seems as though the whole organization needs to buy in to the plan of the front office to be successful. GM's need their guy as the coach to lead the team they assemble.